Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:41:38.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Directed Applications of Herbicides in Irrigated Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. C. Hamilton and
H. F. Arle
K. C. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta., Tucson
H. F. Arle
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr., Phoenix, Arizona
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Directed applications of low rates of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron), disodium methanearsonate (DSMA), monosodium methanearsonate (MSMA), 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium salts (paraquat), and 2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine (prometryne) controlled annual weeds in irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Although the first applications of most herbicides caused temporary, localized foliage chlorosis or burning, cotton yields, fiber properties, and boll components were not affected. Early applications of DSMA followed by diuron selectively controlled annual weeds. When a herbicide was applied before planting, fewer postemergence applications were needed for weed control.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1970, pp. 85 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H. F. and Hamilton, K. C. 1966. Repeat directed applications of low rates of herbicides in cotton. Res. Prog. Rept. West. Weed Contr. Conf. pp. 62–63.Google Scholar
2. Baker, R. S., Arle, H. F., Miller, J. H., and Holstun, J. T. Jr. 1969. Effect of organic arsenical herbicides on cotton response and chemical residues. Weed Sci. 17:37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Baker, R. S., Holstun, J. T. Jr., and Ballentine, W. L. 1967. Directed and overhead sprays of postemergence herbicides on cotton. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 20:60. (Abstr.) Google Scholar
4. Bayer, D. E. and Dever, H. R. 1965. The effects of surfactants on efficiency of foliar-applied diuron. Weeds 13:222–226.Google Scholar
5. Bingham, S. W. and Porter, W. K. Jr. 1961. The influence of N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-methacrylamide on early growth and development of cotton. Weeds 9:282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Frans, R. E. 1962. Some aspects of post-emergence applications of N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) methacrylamide, diuron, and DMA to cotton. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 15:78–84.Google Scholar
7. Foy, C. L. and Miller, J. H. 1955. The effect of various weed-control practices upon yields of cotton grown under conditions of heavy watergrass infestation. Res. Prog. Rept. West. Weed Contr. Conf. pp. 64–66.Google Scholar
8. Hill, G. D. Jr., Belasco, I. J., and Ploeg, H. L. 1965. Influence of surfactants on the activity of diuron, linuron, and bromacil as foliar sprays on weeds. Weeds 13:103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Holstun, J. T. Jr., and Bingham, S. W. 1960. Several triazines as selective post-emergence herbicides in cotton. Weeds 8: 187–193.Google Scholar
10. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effect of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381–405.Google Scholar
11. Leonard, O. A. and Harris, V. C. 1952. The effect of aliphatic hydrocarbons on hypocotyls of cotton and soybeans and on the shoots of nut grass, Johnson grass and other weeds by the directional spray techniques. Weeds 1:256–273.Google Scholar
12. McWhorter, C. G. 1963. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of foliar sprays of diuron. Weeds 11:265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McWhorter, C. G. and Schweizer, E. E. 1964. Effectiveness of a post-emergence split-application of herbicides for weed control. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 17:171–183.Google Scholar
14. Overton, J. R., Mullins, J. A., and Andrews, H. 1968. Effects of post-planting logarithmic applications of fluometuron, prometryne, diuron and norea applied after preplant applications of trifluralin and nitralin on cotton. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 21:76–83.Google Scholar
15. Scifres, C. J. and Santelmann, P. W. 1965. Cotton genotype response to four post-emergence herbicides. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 18:94–101.Google Scholar
16. Scifres, C. J. and Santelmann, P. W. 1966. Response of cotton and sorghum to post-emergence applications of paraquat. Weeds 14:86–88.Google Scholar
17. Tempe, R. E. and Hilton, H. W. 1963. The effect of surfactants on the water solubility of herbicides and the foliar phytotoxicity of surfactants. Weeds 11:297–300.Google Scholar
18. Thompson, J. T. and Hardcastle, W. S. 1963. Postemergence weed control in cotton, Georgia, 1961–1962. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 16:62–66.Google Scholar