Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:09:10.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide-Grazing Interactions in Cheat (Bromus secalinus)–Infested Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeffrey A. Koscelny and
Thomas F. Peeper
Jeffrey A. Koscelny
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the interaction of grazing and herbicide treatments on cheat control and biomass, wheat biomass, wheat grain yield, and wheat yield components. Ethyl-metribuzin at 1120 g ai ha−1 and metribuzin at 420 g ai ha−1 reduced cheat biomass 91 to 99 and 97 to 98%, respectively. Grazing had no effect on herbicide efficacy. Grazing increased cheat biomass in the check by 24% at only one location but did not affect total wheat plus cheat biomass. With one exception, controlled cheat was replaced by wheat on a 1:1 biomass basis when herbicides caused no crop injury. All herbicide treatments increased grain yield, but grazing did not alter yield. At two locations, increased heads m−2 and spikelets/head accounted for most of the grain yield increases, but at one location seeds/spikelet and weight/seed were also increased. Harvest index was unaffected.

Keywords

Ethyl-metribuzin (BAY SMY 1500), 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(ethylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl) - 3 - (methylthio) - 1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onecheat, Bromus secalinus L. # BROSEwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L., ‘TAM 105’Grazingharvest indexyield componentsBROSE

Information

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 1990, pp. 532 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Allan, R. E. 1983. Harvest indexes of backcross-derived wheat lines differing in culm height. Crop Sci. 23:1029–1032.Google Scholar
2. Briggs, K. G. and Aytenfisu, A. 1980. Relationships between morphological characters above the flat leaf node and grain yield in spring wheats. Crop Sci. 20:350–354.Google Scholar
3. Carter, H. W., Norton, H. W., and Dungan, G. H. 1957. Wheat and cheat. Agron. J. 49:261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., Holt, J. S., and Reints, J. S. 1989. Competitive interactions of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oats (Avena fatua) grown at different densities. Weed Sci. 37:538–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cuperus, G., Johnson, R., Tucker, B., Coppock, S., Williams, E., Stiegler, J., Bloome, P., Greer, H., Pitts, J. T., and Fain, D. 1983. Wheat production and pest management in Oklahoma, Circ. E-831. Coop. Ext. Serv., Div. Agric., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK. 35 pp.Google Scholar
6. Dao, T.H. 1987. Crop residues and management of annual grass weeds in continuous no-till wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 35:395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Denman, C. E. and Arnold, J. 1970. Seasonal forage production for small-grains species in Oklahoma. Bull. 680. Agric. Exp. Stn., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK. 21 pp.Google Scholar
8. Faris, D. G. and DePauw, R. M. 1981. Effect of seeding rate on growth and yield of three spring wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res. 3:289–301.Google Scholar
9. Fenster, C. R. and McCalla, T. M. 1970. Tillage practices in western Nebraska with a wheat-fallow rotation. Bull. 507. Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. 20 pp.Google Scholar
10. Gleichsner, J. A., Brewster, B. D., Spinney, R. L., and Appleby, A. P. 1987. Annual brome control in winter wheat. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. Pages 321–322.Google Scholar
11. Harper, H. J. 1961. Grazing and clipping experiments with small-grain pastures in South Central Oklahoma. Bull. 585. Agric. Exp. Stn., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK. 14 pp.Google Scholar
12. Humphreys, L. R. 1966. Pasture defoliation practice: A review. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 32:93–105.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, V. A., Schmidt, J. W., and Mekasha, W. 1966. Comparison of yield components and agronomic characteristics of four winter wheat varieties differing in plant height. Agron. J. 58:438–441.Google Scholar
14. Krenzer, E. and Doye, D. 1988. Economic evaluation of wheat varieties grown for forage plus grain. Current Rep. 2100. Coop. Ext. Serv., Div. Agric., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK. 7 pp.Google Scholar
15. Masses, T. W. 1976. Downy brome control in dryland winter wheat with stubble mulch fallow and seeding management. Agron. J. 68:952–955.Google Scholar
16. Peek, D. C. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Phytotoxicity, adsorption, and mobility of metribuzin and its ethylthio analog as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 37:419–423.Google Scholar
17. Peeper, T. F. 1984. Chemical and biological control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in wheat and alfalfa in North America. Weed Sci. 32, Suppl. 1:18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Phillips, L. J. 1975. Small grain production: Seeding dates and clipping frequency. M. S. Thesis. Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK. 55 pp.Google Scholar
19. Ratliff, R. L. and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Bromus control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with the ethylthio analog of metribuzin. Weed Technol. 1:235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Runyan, T. J., McNeil, N. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1982. Differential tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:94–97.Google Scholar
21. Rydrych, D. J. and Muzik, T. J. 1968. Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat. Agron. J. 60:279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Sharrow, S. H. and Motazedian, I. 1987. Spring grazing effects on components of winter wheat yield. Agron. J. 79:502–504.Google Scholar
23. Whitesides, R. E. and Swan, D. G. 1986. Metribuzin and ethylmetribuzin for downy brome control in winter wheat. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. Pages 230–231.Google Scholar
24. Wicks, G. A. 1984. Integrated systems for control and management of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in cropland. Weed Sci. 32, Suppl. 1:26–31.Google Scholar
25. Winter, S. R. and Thompson, E. K. 1987. Grazing duration effects on wheat growth and grain yield. Agron. J. 79:110–114.Google Scholar