Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T12:16:10.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide-Induced Microbial Invasion of Plant Roots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael P. Greaves and
John A. Sargent
Michael P. Greaves
Affiliation:
AFRC Weed Res. Organization, Yarnton, Oxford OX5 1PF
John A. Sargent
Affiliation:
The Weed Research Organization, Oxford, closed and its research program transferred in part to Long Ashton Research Station, Bristol
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although herbicides are designed to have no effects on the crops in which they are used, crop damage can occur, especially when overdoses are used or if chemicals are applied at an inappropriate time. Usually the resulting damage is recognized as foliar symptoms but roots may be severely affected as well.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue S1: Supplement 1: Microbiological Control of Weeds Symposium , 1986, pp. 50 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Altman, J. and Campbell, C. L. 1979. Herbicides and environment: a review on stimulating and inhibiting interactions with plant diseases. Z.PflKrankh.PflSchutz. 86:290–302.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1973. Mode of action of herbicides. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
3. Andus, L. J. 1948. Studies on the phytostatic action of 2:4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and coumarin. The reversibility of root-growth inhibitions. New Phytol. 47:196–219.Google Scholar
4. Cardenas, J., Slife, F. W., Hansen, J. B. and Butler, H. 1968. Physiological changes accompanying the death of cocklebur plants treated with 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 16: 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Coble, H. D. and Slife, F. W. 1971. Root disfunction in honeyvine milkweed caused by 2, 4-D. Weed Sci. 19:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Currey, W. L. and Teem, D. H. 1976. Herbicides and root development. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. FL. Proc. 36:23–28.Google Scholar
7. Darbyshire, J. F. and Greaves, M. P. 1971. The invasion of pea roots, Pisum sativum L., by soil microorganisms, Acanthamoeba palestinensis (Reich) and Pseudomonas sp. Soil Biol. Biochem. 3:151–155.Google Scholar
8. Elliot, L. F. and Lynch, J. M. 1984. Pseudomonas as a factor in the growth of winter wheat (triticum aestivum L.). Soil Biol. Biochem. (In press).Google Scholar
9. Friesen, H. A., Baenziger, H., and Keys, C. H. 1964. Morphological and cytological effects of dicamba on wheat and barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 44:288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Greaves, M. P. and Darbyshire, J. F. 1975. Microbial decomposition of plant roots. Pages 108–111 in Kilbertus, G., Resinger, O., Maurey, A., and Concerta da Fonseca, J. A., eds. Biodegradation et Humification 1: Proceedings of 1st International Colloquium on Biodegradation and Humification at Nancy. Pierron, Sarreguemines.Google Scholar
11. Katan, J. and Eshel, Y. 1973. Interactions between herbicides and plant pathogens. Residue Rev. 45:145–77.Google Scholar
12. Kloepper, J. W., Leong, J., Teintze, M., and Schroth, M. N. 1980. Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth—promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 286:885–886.Google Scholar
13. Maas, G. 1968. Damage to the anchorage roots (crown roots) of cereals after herbicide treatment. Z.PflKrankh. PflPath. PflSchutz. 75:139–144.Google Scholar
14. Nilsson, H. E. 1973a. Influence of the herbicide mecoprop on Gaeumannomyces graminis and take-all disease of spring wheat. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 3:105–113.Google Scholar
15. Nilsson, H. E. 1973b. Influence of herbicides on take-all and eye-spot disease of winter wheat in a field trial. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 3:115–118.Google Scholar
16. Papavizas, G. C. and Lewis, J. A. 1979. Side-effects of pesticides on soil-borne plant pathogens. Pages 483–505 in Schippers, B. and Gams, W., eds. Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
17. Perotti, R. 1926. On the limits of biological inquiry in soil science. Int. Soc. of Soil Sci. 2:146–161.Google Scholar
18. Scheepens, P. C. 1979. The use of pathogenic mildews to control problem weeds. Gewasbescherming 10:31.Google Scholar
19. Schippers, B. and van Vuurde, J. W. L. 1978. Studies of microbial colonization of wheat roots and the manipulation of the rhizosphere microflora. Pages 295–298 in Loutit, M. W. and Miles, J. A. R., eds. Microb. Ecol. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
20. Skuterud, R. 1975. Tolerance of some varieties of cereals to phenoxy acids. Norw. Plant Protection Inst., Dep. Herboloby. 132:17pp.Google Scholar
21. Suslow, T. V. and Schroth, M. N. 1982. Role of deleterious rhizobacteria as minor pathogens in reducing crop growth. Phytopathology 72:111–115.Google Scholar
22. Tottman, D. R. and Davies, E. L. P. 1978. The effect of herbicides on the root system of wheat plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 90:93–99.Google Scholar
23. Waid, J. S. 1969. Interactions between soil microorganisms and plants. Pages 199–207 in Sheals, J. G., ed. The Soil Ecosystem, Systematics Association Publication No.8.Google Scholar