Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T00:49:09.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenoxy Acid Herbicides for Barnyardgrass Control in Transplanted Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. K. De Datta,
R. Q. Lacsina and
D. E. Seaman
S. K. De Datta
Affiliation:
The International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna (mail address: IRRI, P. O. Box 583, Manila), Philippines
R. Q. Lacsina
Affiliation:
The International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna (mail address: IRRI, P. O. Box 583, Manila), Philippines
D. E. Seaman
Affiliation:
The International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna (mail address: IRRI, P. O. Box 583, Manila), Philippines
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In experiments conducted at the International Rice Research Institute, Philippines, all commonly marketed formulations and derivatives of either [(4-chloro-o-tolyl)oxy]acetic acid (MCPA) or (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid (2,4,D) performed in about the same way and were equally safe for use in controlling barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv.] and other annual weeds in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.). Eleven-day-old rice seedlings were more susceptible to amine salts of 2,4-D or MCPA than 21-day-old seedlings. Granular formulations of some chemicals were relatively less toxic than liquid formulations. The toxic effect of spraying the potassium salt of MCPA was less prolonged on the indica variety, IR22, than it was on the japonica variety, Chianung 242, which had delayed flowering and maturity.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , May 1971, pp. 203 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Arai, M. 1968. Herbicides in Japan. Farming Japan 1:30–37.Google Scholar
2. De Datta, S. K. and Lacsina, R. Q. 1969. Promising new herbicides for transplanted tropical rice. Proc. 2nd Asian-Pacific Weed Control Interchange, Philippines. pp. 112–128.Google Scholar
3. International Rice Research Institute. 1964 Annual Report. Los Baños, Philippines. 335 p.Google Scholar
4. Moomaw, J. C., Novero, V. P., and Tauro, A. C. 1966. Rice weed control in tropical monsoon climates: problems and prospects. Intern. Rice Comm. Newslett. 15(4):1–16.Google Scholar
5. Moomaw, J. C., De Datta, S. K., Seaman, D. E., and Yogaratnam, P. 1968. New directions in weed control research for tropical rice. Proc. British Weed Control Conf. Brighton, U. K. 9:675–681.Google Scholar
6. Noda, K. 1967. Development in the use of granules and mixtures of herbicides for rice culture in Japan. Proc. Asian-Pacific Weed Control Interchange. Honolulu, Hawaii. June 12–22, 1967. pp. 48–52.Google Scholar
7. Ryker, T. C. and Brown, A. C. 1947. The use of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in rice fields for control of weeds. Louisiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 411. 14 p.Google Scholar
8. Smith, R. J. and Shaw, W. C. 1966. Weeds and their control in rice production. Agr. Handbook No. 292. U. S. Dept. Agr., Washington. 64 p.Google Scholar
9. Vega, M. R. 1953. The effect of herbicides on weeds in rice fields. Phil. Agr. 38(1):13–47.Google Scholar
10. Young, F. P. 1962. Experiments of weeding applied 2,4-D in rice paddy fields. Agr. Res. (Taiwan). 11(4):1–10.Google Scholar