Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:54:15.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence AC 263,222 Systems for Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John W. Wilcut,
John S. Richburg III,
Gerald L. Wiley and
F. Robert Walls Jr.
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Univ. Georgia, Coastal Plain Exp. Sta., Tifton, GA 31793-0748
John S. Richburg III
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Univ. Georgia, Coastal Plain Exp. Sta., Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Gerald L. Wiley
Affiliation:
American Cyanamid Co., Tifton, GA 31794
F. Robert Walls Jr.
Affiliation:
American Cyanamid Co., Goldsboro, NC 27530
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies in 1990 and 1991 at six locations in Georgia and one location in North Carolina evaluated AC 263,222 for weed control, peanut tolerance, and yield. AC 263,222 applied early postemergence at 71 g ai ha−1 controlled bristly starbur, coffee senna, common lambsquarters, Ipomoea species, prickly sida, sicklepod, smallflower morningglory, and yellow nutsedge at least 91%. AC 263,222 controlled common cocklebur 77% and Florida beggarweed from 47 to 100%. Crop injury was 4% for AC 263,222 applied once and 12% or less from two applications. Mixtures of bentazon with AC 263,222 did not improve control compared to AC 263,222 alone. Imazethapyr did not improve control of AC 263,222 systems. In several locations, bentazon reduced control of Florida beggarweed with AC 263,222 when applied in a mixture compared to AC 263,222 alone. Weed control from the standard of paraquat plus bentazon applied early postemergence followed by paraquat, bentazon plus 2,4-DB applied POST did not provide the level or spectrum of weed control as AC 263,222 systems.

Keywords

AC 263,222, (+)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl}-5-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidbentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxideimazethapyr, (+)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-butanoic acidparaquat, 1,1′-dimethy-4,4′-bipyridinium ionbristly starbur, Acanthospermum hispidum DC. ♯ ACNHIcommon cocklebur,Xanthium strumurium L. ♯ XANSTcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album♯ CHEALFlorida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum(SW.) DC. ♯ DEDTO, coffee senna, Cassia occidentalis L. ♯ CASOCprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. ♯ SIDSPsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby ♯ CASOBsmallflower morningglory, Jacquemontia tamnifolia(L.) Griseb ♯ IAQTAyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. ♯ CYPESpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.ACNHICASOBCASOCCHEALCYPESDEDTOIAQTASIDSPXANST

Information

Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 1996, pp. 615 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Brecke, B. J. and Colvin, D. L. 1991. Weed management in peanuts. Pages 239–251 in Pimentel, D., ed., CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. Vol. 3. 2nd ed., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
2. Bridges, D. C., Walker, R. H., McGuire, J. A., and Martin, N. R. 1984. Efficiency of chemical and mechanical methods for controlling weeds in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 32: 584–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dowler, C. D. 1993. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46: 430–464.Google Scholar
4. Henning, R. J., Allison, A. H., and Tripp, L. D. 1982. Cultural practices. Pages 123–138 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc, Inc., Yoakum, TX.Google Scholar
5. Grichar, W. J., Nester, P. R., and Colburn, A. E. 1992. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6: 396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Bruff, S. A. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 7: 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Porter, D. M., Smith, D. H., and Rodriquez-Kabana, R. 1982. Peanut plant diseases. Pages 326–410 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. Yoakum, TX.Google Scholar
8. Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1993. Toxicity of foliar and/or soil applied imazethapyr to purple an d yellow (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Technol. 7: 900–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. Toxicity of foliar and/or soil applied AC 263,222 to purple and yellow (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Sci. 42: 398–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., Culbreath, A. C., and Kvien, C. K. 199. Response of eight peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to the herbicide AC 263,222. Peanut Sci. 22: 76–80.Google Scholar
11. Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1992. Influence of bentazon on the phytotoxicity of paraquat to peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 40: 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., McGuire, J. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1991. Foliar penetration and phytotoxicity of paraquat as influenced by peanut cultivar. Peanut Sci. 18: 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Wehtje, G. R., McGuire, J. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1986. Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with paraquat. Weed Sci. 34: 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wilcut, J. W. and Richburg, J. S. III. 1992. Pursuit and Cadre mixtures for weed control in Georgia peanuts. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 24: 46.Google Scholar
15. Wilcut, J. W., Walls, F. R. Jr., and Horton, D. N. 1991. Weed control, yield, and net returns using imazethapyr in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 39: 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Wilcut, J. W., Walls, F. R. Jr., and Horton, D. N. 1991. Imazethapyr for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 18: 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., and Patterson, M. G. 1987. Economic assessment of weed control systems for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 35: 433–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., and Walker, R. H. 1987. Economics of weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with herbicides and cultivations. Weed Sci. 35: 711–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 177–205.Google Scholar
20. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Cole, T. A., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37: 385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Wiley, G., Jones, S. R., and Iverson, M. J. 1994. Imidazolinone herbicide systems for peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 21: 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Eastin, E. F., Wiley, G. R., Walls, F. R., and Newell, S. Imazethapyr and paraquat systems for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 41: 601–607.Google Scholar
23. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Use of AC 263,222 for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean. Weed Technol. 5: 434–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effect of adjuvants on weed control and soybean (Glycine max) tolerance with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 5: 817–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Young, J. H., Person, N. K., Donald, J. O., and Mayfield, W. H. 1982. Harvesting, curing, and energy utilization. Pages 458–487 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. American Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX.Google Scholar