Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:56:25.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Small-Grain Cultivars to Chlorsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry H. Hageman and
Richard Behrens
Larry H. Hageman
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Richard Behrens
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The response of several spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars to preemergence and postemergence applications of chlorsulfuron (tested under code number DPX-4189) {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} was evaluated in the field and greenhouse in 1979. In greenhouse experiments, ‘Butte’ spring wheat was less susceptible than six other spring wheat cultivars to chlorsulfuron at 1.0 kg/ha applied preemergence or postemergence. ‘Morex’, ‘Conquest’, and ‘Bonanza’ barley cultivars were less susceptible than six other barley cultivars to preemergence chlorsulfuron, but barley cultivars were similar in response to postemergence chlorsulfuron. The eight oat cultivars responded similarly to preemergence and postemergence chlorsulfuron at 1.0 kg/ha. Data from two field experiments, which included evaluation of durum wheat [Triticum durum (Desf.)] cultivars, indicated that the four small grains had adequate tolerance to postemergence chlorsulfuron at 0.125 and 0.25 kg/ha, except that durum wheat grain yield was reduced by 0.25 kg/ha at the Rosemount location. No differential cultivar responses to chlorsulfuron occurred among the small grains in the field.

Keywords

Differential cultivar responsespring and durum wheatoatbarley

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , July 1981, pp. 414 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. A. 1978. Herbicide evaluation for weed control in oats and wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 35:104–106.Google Scholar
2. Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. A. 1979. Herbicide evaluation for weed control in oats and wheat, Rosemount, MN – 1979. North Cent. Weed Control Res. Rep. 36:83–85.Google Scholar
3. Bohmont, D. W. 1948. Effect of 2,4-D as an herbicide on spring wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 5:24.Google Scholar
4. Derscheid, L. A. 1951. Control of weeds in spring sown grain. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 8:54.Google Scholar
5. Derscheid, L. A., Stahler, L. M., and Kratochvil, D. E. 1952. Differential responses of barley varieties to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D.). Agron. J. 44:182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Foster, J. R. 1949. Effect of 2,4-D on different varieties of hard red spring wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:104.Google Scholar
7. Foster, J. R. 1949. Effect of 2,4-D on different varieties of oats. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:104.Google Scholar
8. Helgeson, E. A. 1949. Reaction of several spring wheat sprayed with three formulations of 2,4-D at tillering. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:109.Google Scholar
9. Hodgson, J. M., Thrasher, F. P., and Eslick, R. F. 1964. Effects of eight herbicides on yields of barley and wheat varieties. Crop Sci. 4:307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kusch, A. G. 1947. Varietal differences in crop tolerances to 2,4-D. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 4:219.Google Scholar
11. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1974. Hard red spring wheat cultivar response to difenzoquat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 31:93.Google Scholar
12. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1978. Broadleaf weed control in wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 35:123.Google Scholar
13. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1978. False chamomile control in spring wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 35:129.Google Scholar
14. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1978. Preemergence foxtail control in wheat and barley. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 35:87.Google Scholar
15. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1979. Barley cultivar response to several herbicides. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 36:78.Google Scholar
16. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1979. Wheat cultivar response to several herbicides. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 36:96.Google Scholar
17. Morrison, I. N. and Maurice, D. C. 1978. Wild buckwheat control in wheat with R-40244, DPX-4189 and other herbicides. Western Can. Exp. Comm. on Weeds Res. Rep. I(b):306.Google Scholar
18. Nalewaja, J. D. and Miller, S. D. 1979. Broadleaf weed control in wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 36:97.Google Scholar
19. Olson, P. J. and Breakey, W. J. 1949. Response of varieties of wheat, oats, and barley to 2,4-D. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:109.Google Scholar
20. Phillips, W. M. 1949. Varietal reaction of winter wheat to 2,4-D. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:73.Google Scholar
21. Robinson, R. D., Dunham, R. S., and Shulstad, O. 1950. Response of oat varieties to 2,4-D and MCPA at seedling and full tiller stages. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 7:78.Google Scholar
22. Shaw, W. C. and Willard, C. J. 1949. Varietal differences in the effect of 2,4-D on oats. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:111c.Google Scholar
23. Shaw, W. C. and Willard, C. J. 1949. Varietal differences in the effect of 2,4-D on wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:74.Google Scholar
24. Slife, F. W. and Fuelleman, R. F. 1969. Effect of 2,4-D on winter wheat varieties. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 26:74.Google Scholar
25. Staniforth, D. W. and Atkins, R. E. 1952. Effect of 2,4-D on yield and bushel weight of oats. Agron. J. 44:587–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Viehmeyer, G. and Wolfe, H. 1947. Differential response of oats and barley varieties to varied dosages of three types of 2,4-D. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 4:237.Google Scholar
27. Warden, R. L. and Bullette, J. W. 1949. Response of six spring wheat varieties to 2,4-D. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:111d.Google Scholar
28. Wiebe, G. A. and Hayes, J. D. 1960. The role of genetics in the use of agricultural chemicals. Agron. J. 52:685–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Williams, J. H. 1954. Differential varietal response of oat varieties to 2,4-D. Agron. J. 46:565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Woestemeyer, V. W. 1949. Effect of 2,4-D on six varieties of winter wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 6:75.Google Scholar