Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T02:25:31.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure of Weed Communities in Saskatchewan Fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark R. T. Dale  and
A. Gordon Thomas
Mark R. T. Dale
Affiliation:
Bot. Dep., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada
A. Gordon Thomas
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 3A2, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the communities of weeds in cereal and oilseed crops in Saskatchewan, using data collected in a 4-yr survey that sampled more than 400 fields. The survey data for the 40 most common weeds were analyzed in an attempt to distinguish natural groups of weed species and to compare the weed communities associated with the different crops and with different soils. The crops were barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), flax (Linum usitatissimum L.), oats (Avena sativa L.), rape (Brassica campestris L., Brassica napus L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Phytosociological association and cluster analysis indicated that the associations of the weed species were more or less independent of the crop, although some differences existed and were determined more by soil or the associated climate. The 40 most common species were divided into three groups related to the soil and climatic subregions of the province.

Keywords

Cluster analysisphytosociological structure

Information

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , May 1987 , pp. 348 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Dale, M. R. T. 1977. Graph theoretical analysis of the phytosociological structure of plant communities: the theoretical basis. Vegetatio 34:137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dale, M. R. T. 1985. Graph theoretical methods for comparing phytosociological structures. Vegetatio 63:79–88.Google Scholar
3. Legendre, L. and Legendre, P. 1983. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 419 pp.Google Scholar
4. Pielou, E. C. 1984. The Interpretation of Ecological Data. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 263 pp.Google Scholar
5. Rohlf, F. J. 1974. Methods of comparing classifications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. and Syst. 5:101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 859 pp.Google Scholar
7. Streibig, J. C. 1979. Numerical methods illustrating the phytosociology of crops in relation to weed flora. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Thomas, A. G. 1985. Weed surveys systems used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Sci. 33:34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar