Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:10:45.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uptake of Herbicides by Soybean Seed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. Rieder,
K. P. Buchholtz and
C. A. Kust
G. Rieder
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin
K. P. Buchholtz
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
C. A. Kust
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The uptake of herbicides by soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) seed from 14C-labeled aqueous solutions of 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (amiben), 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (atrazine), 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (linuron), S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC), and isopropyl m-chlorocarbanilate (chlorpropham) was determined by measuring reduction in the concentration of the herbicides in the soaking solution. There was a direct proportional relationship between uptake and concentration. Raising the temperature from 10 to 30 C increased uptake of herbicides. The greatest increase occurred from 10 to 20 C. After 48 hr at 30 C, 39% of the amiben, 61% of the atrazine, 65% of the EPTC, 83% of the linuron, and 92% of the chlorpropham in the original solution was absorbed by the seed. Uptake rates were similar in living and dead seed. Uptake was reversible with amiben but not with chlorpropham. Absorption of herbicides could not be associated with absorption of water except during the first few hours when the seed were rapidly imbibing water. Ratios of seed to solution herbicide concentrations all exceeded 1:1 after 48 hr and with chlorpropham, reached 68:1. The uptake of herbicides by seed was largely a physical process that required seed hydration, but herbicide uptake continued after water uptake ceased.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1970, pp. 101 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M. and Helfgott, S. 1966. Uptake and distribution of CIPC in seeds during imbibition. Proc. Calif. Weed Contr. Conf. 18:8.Google Scholar
2. Brauner, L. 1956. Die Permeabilität der Zellwand. In Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie (Enc. Pl. Phys.), ed. Ruhland, W., 11:337–357. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.Google Scholar
3. Everson, L. 1950. Further studies on the effect of 2,4-D on seeds. Proc. Assoc. Off. Seed Anal. 40:84–87.Google Scholar
4. Gray, R. A. and Weierich, A. J. 1969. Importance of root, shoot, and seed exposure on the herbicidal activity of EPTC. Weed Sci. 17:223–229.Google Scholar
5. Hance, R. J. 1967. The speed of attainment of sorption equilibria in some systems involving herbicides. Weed Res. 7:29–36.Google Scholar
6. Hansen, J. R. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1952. Absorption of 2,4-D by corn and pea seeds. Agron. J. 44:493–496.Google Scholar
7. Haskell, D. A. and Rogers, B. J. 1960. The entry of herbicides into seeds. Proc. North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 17:39.Google Scholar
8. Hocombe, S. D. 1968. The uptake of atrazine by germinating seeds of turnip (Brassica rapa L.). Weed Res. 8:68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mitchell, J. W. and Brown, J. W. 1947. Relative sensitivity of dormant and germinating seeds to 2,4-D. Science 106: 266–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ott, D. G., Richmond, C. R., Trujillo, T. T. and Foreman, H. 1959. Cab-o-Sil suspensions for liquid scintillation counting. Nucleonics 17 (No. 9): 106–108.Google Scholar
11. Rakitin, Y. and Potapova, A. K. 1959. (Penetration of herbicides into plants and their influence on phosphorus uptake). Fiziologiya rastenii 6(5):614–616. Engl. transl. in Soviet Plant Physiol. 6(5):621–623.Google Scholar
12. Swan, D. G. and Slife, F. W. 1965. The absorption, translocation, and fate of amiben in soybeans. Weeds 13:133–138.Google Scholar
13. Weed Society of America. 1967. Herbicide Handbook. Humphrey Press, Geneva, New York. 293 p.Google Scholar
14. Wierszyllowski, J. 1961. (Water and synthetic growth substances (IAA, 2,4-D) uptake by dormant and stratified pear seeds). Roczniki Nauk Roiniczych Ser. A 83:549–86. (Engl. summary).Google Scholar