Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:13:12.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using landscape characteristics as prior information for Bayesian classification of yellow starthistle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bahman Shafii,
William J. Price,
Timothy S. Prather,
Lawrence W. Lass and
Donald C. Thill
William J. Price
Affiliation:
Statistical Programs, P.O. Box 442337, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2337
Timothy S. Prather
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, P.O. Box 442339, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
Lawrence W. Lass
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, P.O. Box 442339, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, P.O. Box 442339, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Yellow starthistle is an invasive plant of canyon grasslands in north-central Idaho. The distribution of yellow starthistle is associated with general landscape characteristics that include land use and specific terrain-related features such as elevation, slope, and aspect. Slope and aspect can be considered as indicators of plant community composition and distribution. Hence, these variables may be incorporated into prediction models to estimate the likelihood of yellow starthistle occurrence because plant communities differ in susceptibility to invasion. An empirically derived nonlinear model based on landscape characteristics has previously been developed to predict the likelihood of yellow starthistle occurrence in north-central Idaho. Although the model was used to predict the invasion potential of yellow starthistle into new areas, it could also be used as auxiliary data for classifying this weed species in remotely sensed imagery. To accomplish this, the predicted values from the model are regarded as prior information on the presence of yellow starthistle. A Bayesian image classification algorithm using this prior information is then applied to a corresponding set of remotely sensed data. This results in a map indicating the posterior probabilities of yellow starthistle occurrence given the landscape characteristics. This technique is demonstrated and is shown to reduce omissional error rates by 50% when the landscape characteristics are incorporated into the classification process.

Keywords

Yellow starthistle, Centaurea solstitialis L. CENSONonlinear modelimage classificationposterior probabilitieserror rates

Information

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 6 , December 2004, pp. 948 - 953
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Barry, S. 1995. Cattle Fecal Fax. University of California, Cooperative Extension. October Rep. November 7, 1995. Oakland, CA: University of California Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
Callihan, R. H., Smith, L., McCaffrey, J. P., and Michalson, E. 1995. Yellow Starthistle Management for Small Acreages. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Cooperative Extension System Bull. CIS 1025, 8 p.Google Scholar
Congalton, R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ 37:35–46.Google Scholar
Cordy, D. R. 1954a. Nigropallidal encephalomalacia (chewing disease) in horses on rations high in yellow star thistle. Proc. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc 91:149–154.Google Scholar
Cordy, D. R. 1954b. Nigropallidal encephalomalacia in horses associated with ingestion of yellow star thistle. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol 13:330–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerlach, J. D. Jr. 1997. The introduction, dynamics of geographic range expansion, and ecosystem effects of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Proc. Calif. Weed Sci. Soc 49:136–141.Google Scholar
Lass, L. W., Shafii, B., Price, W. J., and Thill, D. C. 2000. Assessing agreement in multispectral images of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) with ground truth data using a Bayesian methodology. Weed Technol 14:539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, L. W J., Carson, H. W., and Callihan, R. H. 1996. Detection of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and common St. Johnswort (Hypericum perforatum) with multispectral digital imagery. Weed Technol 10:466–474.Google Scholar
Randall, J. M. 1994. Weeds and the preservation of natural areas. Proc. Calif. Weed Sci. Soc 46:143–154.Google Scholar
Rejmanek, M. and Pitcairn, M. J. 2002. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal?. Pages 249–253 in Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M. N. eds. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, Great Britain: IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Roché, B. F. Jr., Roché, C. T., and Chapman, R. C. 1994. Impact of grassland habitat on yellow starthistle invasion. Northwest Sci 68:86–96.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2001. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8, Volume 2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Shafii, B. and Price, W. J. 2001. Application of Bayesian methods for assessing the detection accuracy in remote sensing. in Proceeding of American Statistical Association, Section on Bayesian Statistics, CD-ROM. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Shafii, B., Price, W. J., Prather, T. S., Lass, L. W., and Thill, D. C. 2003. Predicting the likelihood of yellow starthistle occurrence using landscape characteristics. Weed Sci 51:748–751.Google Scholar
Theodoridis, S. and Koutroumbas, K. 1999. Pattern Recognition. New York: Academic. Pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Zamora, D. L., Eplee, R. E., and Thill, D. C. 1989. An eradication plan for plant invasions. Weed Technol 3:2–12.Google Scholar