Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T07:43:50.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Seed and Seedling Reductions by Soil Solarization by Transparent Polyethylene Sheets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Grant H. Egley
Grant H. Egley*
Affiliation:
Plant Physiol., South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Solarization by means of transparent polyethylene sheets for 1 week in mid-summer significantly (P = 0.05) reduced numbers of viable prickly sida (Sida spinosa L.), common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) and spurred anoda [Anoda cristata (L.) Schlect.] seeds remaining after burial in soil. Solarization treatments for 1 to 4 weeks significantly reduced the total weed emergence of prickly sida, pigweeds (Amaranthus species), spurred anoda, morningglories (Ipomoea species), horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum L.), and various grass species from natural seed populations for the growing season by 64 to 98%. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) emergence was increased by solarization in some instances. It was not determined if the increased emergence was from tubers or seeds. Maximum temperatures at the 1.3-cm soil depth under the polyethylene sheets reached 65 to 69C for 3 to 4 h of the mid-afternoon on clear days as compared with 43 to 50C at 1.3 cm in the soils that were not covered. Surface soil-moisture levels were also elevated under the polyethylene covers. Although solarization did not eliminate dormant weed seeds from the germination zone, the treatment killed nondormant seeds and greatly reduced the number of weed seedlings that otherwise would have emerged.

Keywords

Mulchseed germinationsoil moisturesoil temperature

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , May 1983, pp. 404 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Abdalla, F. H. and Roberts, E. H. 1968. Effects of temperature, moisture, and oxygen on the induction of chromosome damage in seeds of barley, broad beans and peas during storage. Ann. Bot. 32:119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Adams, J. E. 1970. Effect of mulches and bed configuration. II. Soil temperature and growth and yield responses of grain sorghum and corn. Agron. J. 62:785–790.Google Scholar
3. Andrew, R. H., Schlough, D. A., and Tempas, G. H. 1976. Some relationships of a plastic mulch to sweet corn maturity. Agron. J. 68:422–425.Google Scholar
4. Army, T. J. and Hudspeth, E. B. Jr. 1960. Alteration of the microclimate of the seed zone. Agron. J. 52:17–22.Google Scholar
5. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1978. Germination and viability of weed seeds after 2.5 years in the 50-year buried seed study. Weed Sci. 26:230–239.Google Scholar
6. Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1978. Glyphosate and paraquat effects on weed seed germination and seedling emergence. Weed Sci. 26:249–251.Google Scholar
7. Gubbels, G. H. 1972. Effects of plastic mulch and row spacing on carrot growth north of latitude 60° N. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:660–661.Google Scholar
8. Harrington, J. F. 1972. Seed storage and longevity. Pages 145–245 in Kozlowski, T. T., ed. Seed Biology, Vol. 3, Insects and Seed Collection, Storage, Testing and Certification. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
9. Harrison, B. J. 1966. Seed deterioration in relation to storage conditions and its influence upon germination, chromosomal damage and plant performance. J. Natl. Inst. Agric. Bot. (G. B.) 10:644–663.Google Scholar
10. Horowitz, M. 1980. Weed research in Israel. Weed Sci. 18:457–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Jacobsohn, R., Greenberger, A., Katan, J., Levi, M., and Alon, H. 1980. Control of Egyptian broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca) and other weeds by means of solar heating of the soil by polyethylene mulching. Weed Sci. 28:312–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Katan, J. 1981. Solar heating (Solarization) of soil for control of soil borne pests. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 19:211–236.Google Scholar
13. Katan, J., Greenberger, A., Alon, H., and Grinstein, A. 1976. Solar heating by polyethylene mulching for the control of diseases caused by soil-borne pathogens. Phytopathology 66: 683–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Lee, S. S., Estes, G. O., and Wells, O. S. 1978. Effects of slitted polyethylene mulches on soil temperature and yield of sweet corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:55–61.Google Scholar
15. Lippert, L. F., Takatori, F. H., and Whiting, F. L. 1964. Soil moisture under bands of petroleum and polyethylene mulches: Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 85:541–546.Google Scholar
16. Pullman, G. S., DeVay, J. E., and Garber, R. H. 1981. Soil solarization and thermal death: a logarithmic relationship between time and temperature for four soil-borne plant pathogens. Phytopathology 71:959–964.Google Scholar