Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:35:33.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bioassay of Herbicide Combinations with Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. S. Hardcastle and
R. E. Wilkinson
W. S. Hardcastle
Affiliation:
The Georgia Station, Experiment, Georgia
R. E. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
The Georgia Station, Experiment, Georgia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L., var. Bluebonnet) bioassay was utilized to evaluate activity of several herbicide combinations at concentrations of each individual compound causing a 50% reduction in root length. Synergistic combinations were trichloroacetic acid (TCA) plus 1,1-dimethyl-3-phenylurea (fenuron); TCA plus 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (monuron); TCA plus 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron); TCA plus 3-amino-s-triazole (amitrole); TCA plus 2,2-dichloropropionic acid (dalapon); and dalapon plus monuron. Additive results were obtained from combinations of TCA plus 1,2-dihydro-3,6-pyridazinedione (MH); dalapon plus fenuron; and dalapon plus diuron. MH and (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid (2,4-D) exhibited antagonistic responses when combined with fenuron, monuron, diuron, dalapon, amitrole, and with each other. Antagonistic responses were obtained from combination of 2,4-D and TCA.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , May 1970, pp. 336 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Christolph, R. J. and Fisk, E. L. 1954. Responses of plants to herbicides 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (CMU). Bot. Gaz. 116:1–14.Google Scholar
2. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
3. Cooke, A. R. 1956. A possible mechanism of action of the urea type herbicides. Weeds 4:397–398.Google Scholar
4. Crafts, A. S. 1961. The Chemistry and Mode of Action of Herbicides. Interscience Publ., New York, N. Y. 269 p.Google Scholar
5. Geaghegan, M. J. 1957. The effect of some substituted methylureas on the respiration of Chlorella vulgaris var. viridis. New Phytol. 56:71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hilton, J. L., Ard, J. S., Jansen, L. L., and Gentner, W. A. 1959. The pantothenate-synthesizing enzyme, a metabolic site in the herbicidal action of chlorinated aliphatic acids. Weeds 7:381–396.Google Scholar
7. Hilton, J. L. 1960. Effect of histidine on the inhibitory action of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. Weeds 8:392–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Redemann, C. T. and Hamaker, J. 1954. Dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) as a protein precipitant. Weeds 3: 387–388.Google Scholar
9. Rogers, B. J. 1957. Translocation and fate of amino triazole in plants. Weeds 5:5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. van Overbeek, J. 1947. Use of synthetic hormones as weed killers in tropical agriculture. Econ. Bot. 1:446–449.Google Scholar
11. Wilkinson, R. E. 1962. Growth inhibitions by 2,2-dichloropropionic acid. Weeds 10:275–281.Google Scholar