Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T05:54:36.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clomazone Dissipation in Two Tennessee Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. Bruce Kirksey,
Robert M. Hayes,
William A. Krueger,
Charles A. Mullins and
Thomas C. Mueller
K. Bruce Kirksey
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Tenn., Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Robert M. Hayes
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Tenn., Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
William A. Krueger
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Tenn., Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Charles A. Mullins
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Tenn., Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Thomas C. Mueller*
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Tenn., Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
*
* Corresponding author, T. C. Mueller E-mail, TMUELLER@UTK.EDU.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clomazone dissipation in soil was examined in field and laboratory experiments. Field studies suggested a potential for injury to rotational crops such as wheat. Field half-lives were 5 to 29 d (average of 9 field studies was 19 d) for the Etowah clay loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic typic Paleudult) and Lily loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic typic Hapludult) soils. Clomazone had an average half-life of 34 d under lab conditions, indicating slower dissipation in the lab than in the field. Clomazone was moderately adsorbed to soil as indicated by a Kd of about 1, and a Kom of 52 in the two soils.

Keywords

Clomazone, (2-[(2-chlorophenyl) methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone)snap bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. variety ‘Blue Ridge.’Persistencerotational cropsHPLC

Information

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1996, pp. 959 - 963
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Current address of senior author is 926 S. Arch St., Aberdeen, SD 57401.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. FMC Corporation. 1987. Technical information report on Command. Agric. Chem. Group, Philadelphia, PA 19103.Google Scholar
Ahrens, W. H. and Fuerst, E. P. 1990. Carryover injury of clomazone applied in soybeans (Glycine max) and fallow. Weed Technol. 4: 855–861.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. 1965. Cation exchange capacity. Pages 891–901 in Black, C. A. et al. (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. 1st ed. Agronomy Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, F. W. 1992. Effects of tillage and application methods on clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr persistence. Weed Sci. 40: 482–489.Google Scholar
Froelich, L. W., Bixler, T. A., and Robinson, R. A. 1984. Soil metabolism and mobility of FMC 57020: a new soybean herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39: 79.Google Scholar
Gallandt, E. R., Fay, P. K. and Inskeep, W. P. 1989. Clomazone dissipation in two Montana soils. Weed Technol. 3: 146–150.Google Scholar
Gunsolus, J. L., Behrens, R. H., Lueschen, W. E., Warnes, D. D., and Wiersma, J. V. 1986. Carryover potential of AC-263,449, DPX-F6025, FMC 57020, and imazaquin in Minnesota. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41: 52.Google Scholar
Kilmer, V.J., and Alexander, L. T. 1949. Methods of making mechanical analysis of soils. Soil Sci. 68: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirksey, K. B. and Mueller, T. C. 1995. Effect of extraction systems on clomazone recovery from aged soils. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 87: 1519–1521.Google Scholar
Klute, A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. Pages 635–662 in Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Krueger, W. A., Thompson, M. A., Willian, W. T., and Kirksey, K. B. 1991. Developing weed control programs for tobacco beds. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44: 168.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37: 259–267.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of clomazone on soils, sediments, and clays. Weed Sci. 37: 440–444.Google Scholar
Mervosh, T. L., Stoller, E. W., Simmons, F. W., Ellsworth, T. R., Sims, G. K. 1995a. Effects of starch encapsulation on clomazone and atrazine movement in soil and clomazone volatilization. Weed Sci. 43: 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervosh, T. L., Sims, G. K., and Stoller, E. W. 1995b. Clomazone fate as affected by microbial activity, temperature, and soil moisture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43: 537–543.Google Scholar
Mills, J. A., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of tillage on the efficacy and persistence of clomazone in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37: 217–222.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L.E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pages 539–579 in Page, A. L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Olsen, R. V. and Ellis, R. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirements. Pages 311–312 in Page, A. L. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monogr. 9. ASA and SSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. The adsorption of some s-triazines in soils. Weeds 13: 46–52.Google Scholar
Tymonko, J. M. and Guscar, H. L. 1984. Influence of soil properties on the activity of clomazone. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39: 76.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 1987. Herbicide persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 3: 1–17.Google Scholar