Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:55:04.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compatibility of Chemical and Mechanical Weed Control Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. P. Upchurch and
F. L. Selman
R. P. Upchurch
Affiliation:
Agricultural Division, Monsanto Co., St. Louis, Mo.
F. L. Selman
Affiliation:
Velsicol Chemical Corporation, West Point, Miss.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicides were applied postplant to field grown peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsatum L.) in association with various cultivation devices. Rotary cultivations were compatible with single or multiple chemical treatments applied to soil. For eight preemergence herbicides commonly used on a nonincorporated basis, use of the multiple-application multiple-rotarycultivation technique, in comparison to the common method of use, increased the early-season weed control rating from 3.4 to 4.5 (scale 1.0 = no control, 5.0 = perfect), reduced weeds from 209 to 37 plants/50 sq ft, increased length of control from 36 to 50 days, and reduced the manual hoe time requirement from 24 to 10 hr/A. Incorporation of single or multiple chemical treatments decreased crop safety for some herbicides especially where cotton was the crop. The power driven rotary cultivator was superior to the standard sweep-equipped cultivator and the weeder for use in conjunction with multiple chemical applications. Herbicidal applications incorporated with the rotary cultivator at 0, 7, and 14; 7, 14, and 21; or 0, 14, and 28 days after planting provided equal weed control.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 1968, pp. 121 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M. and Dunster, Kenneth. 1961. The herbicidal effect of EPTC, CDEC, and CDAA on Echinochloa crusgalli with various depths of soil incorporation. Weeds 9:312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Clague, Thomas E. 1965. Progress report on ro-wheel in corporation. Proc. SWC 18:207–211.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. 1963. Development of barnyardgrass seedlings and their response to EPTC. Weeds 11:60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Holstun, J. T. Jr. 1963. Cultivation techniques in combination with chemical weed control in cotton. Weeds 11:190–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Holstun, J. T. Jr. 1966. Placement of herbicides as it affects weeds and crops. Proc. SWC 19:27–34.Google Scholar
6. Kempen, H. M., Miller, J. H., and Carter, L. M. 1963. Preemergence herbicides incorporated in moist soils for control of annual grass in irrigated cotton. Weeds 11:300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Knake, E. L., Slife, F. W., and Seif, R. D. 1965. The effect of rotary hoeing on performance of preemergence herbicides. Weeds 13:72–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lovely, W. G., Weber, C. R., and Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Effectiveness of the rotary hoe for weed control in soybeans. Agron. J. 50:621–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. and Schweizer, E. E. 1964. Effectiveness of a postemergence split-application of herbicides for weed control. Proc. SWC 17:171–183.Google Scholar
10. Menges, Robert M. and Hubbard, J. L. 1965. Soil-surface and soil-incorporated applications of herbicides in furrow-irrigated spinach. Proc. of Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 87:363–370.Google Scholar
11. Menges, Robert M. and Hubbard, J. L. 1966. Herbicidal performances of CDEC and EPTC incorporated to various depths in furrow-irrigated soils. Weeds 14:215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Parochetti, J. V. and Warren, G. F. 1966. Vapor losses of IPC and CIPC. Weeds 14:281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Peters, Elroy J., Klingman, Dayton L., and Larson, Russell E. 1959. Rotary hoeing in combination with herbicides and other cultivations for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 7:449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Selman, F. L. and Upchurch, R. P. 1964. The influence of split application and incorporation of herbicides on their activity and selectivity. Proc. SWC 17:377. (Abstr.) Google Scholar
15. Splittstoesser, Walter E. and Derscheid, Lyle A. 1962. Effects of environment upon herbicides applied preemergence. Weeds 10:304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Upchurch, R. P. 1966. Behavior of herbicides in soil. Residue Rev. 16:46–85.Google Scholar
17. Waldrep, T. W. and Freeman, J. F. 1964. EPTC injury to corn as affected by depth of incorporation in the soil. Weeds 12:315–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar