Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T03:16:18.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences in Seed Morphometric and Germination Traits of Crofton Weed (Eupatorium adenophorum) from Different Elevations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Yang-Ping Li and
Yu-Long Feng
Yang-Ping Li
Affiliation:
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla County, Yunnan Province, 666303, China
Yu-Long Feng*
Affiliation:
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla County, Yunnan Province, 666303, China
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: fyl@xtbg.ac.cn
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Crofton weed is a noxious invasive weed worldwide. However, the mechanisms underlying its invasiveness are still not well understood. We hypothesize that genetic differentiation and plasticity may help the plant invade heterogeneous habitats. To test this hypothesis, we compared the differences in seed morphometric and germination traits among 14 populations of the plant located at different elevations (640–2,430 m) in south Yunnan Province of southwest China. Germination capacity (GC) and index (GI) were markedly different among the 14 populations at the same temperature or water treatment. The results indicated genetic differentiations in these traits; maternal effects were not excluded. GC and GI were also different for each population across temperature or water treatments, showing phenotypic plasticity. Croton weed seed size and weight also responded genetically or plastically (or both) to different elevations. Seed width, weight, GC, and GI at each temperature increased with the increase of the elevation of origin, showing clinal variation patterns that reveal local adaptations to habitats encountered by the plant. The large seeds, high GC, and high GI could improve emergence, establishment, growth, and survival of seedlings at high elevation; the low GI could prevent seed germination before the onset of the rainy season at low elevation. On the basis of the results, genetic differentiation and plasticity in seed size and germination traits may help crofton weed acclimate to different elevations, facilitating its invasiveness.

Keywords

Crofton weed, Eupatorium adenophorum Sprengel [Syn. Ageratina adenophora (Sprengel) R. M. King & H. Robinson]Genetic differentiationgerminationinvasive weedplasticityseed sizetemperaturewater stress

Information

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 2009, pp. 26 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Beckstead, J., Meyer, S. E., and Allen, P. S. 1996. Bromus tectorum seed germination: between-population and between-year variation. Can. J. Bot. 74:875–882.Google Scholar
Benowicz, A., El-Kassaby, Y. A., Guy, R. D., and Ying, C. C. 2000. Sitka Alder (Alnus sinuate RYDB.) genetic diversity in germination, frost hardiness and growth attributes. Silvae Genet. 49:206–212.Google Scholar
Bischoff, A., Cremieux, L., Smilauerova, M., et al. 2006. Detecting local adaptation in wildspread grassland species—the importance of scale and local plant community. J. Ecol. 94:1130–1142.Google Scholar
Boydak, M., Dirik, H., Tilki, F., and Calikoglu, M. 2003. Effects of water stress on germination in six provenances of Pinus brutia seeds from different bioclimatic zones in Turkey. Turk. J. Arc. For. 27:91–97.Google Scholar
Cronk, Q. C. B. and Fuller, J. L. 1995. Plant Invaders: The Threat to Natural Ecosystems. London Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:183–211.Google Scholar
Duan, H., Qiang, S., Su, X. H., Hai, H. R., Zhu, Y. Z., and Liu, L. L. 2005. Genetic diversity of Eupatorium adenophorum determined by AFLP marker. Acta Ecol. Sin. 25:2109–2114. [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Feng, Y-L. 2008. Photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation and specific leaf area in invasive Eupatorium adenophorum and native Eupatorium japonicum grown at different irradiances. Physiol. Plant. 133:318–326.Google Scholar
Feng, Y-L., Wang, J-F., and Sang, W-G. 2007a. Biomass allocation, morphology and photosynthesis of invasive and noninvasive exotic species grown at four irradiance levels. Acta Oecol. 31:40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Y-L., Wang, J-F., and Sang, W-G. 2007b. Irradiance acclimation, capture ability and efficiency in invasive and noninvasive alien plant species. Photosynthetica. 45:245–253.Google Scholar
Gera, M., Gera, N., and Ginwal, H. S. 2000. Seed trait variations in Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Seed Sci. Technol. 28:467–475.Google Scholar
Gross, K. L. 1984. Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants. J. Ecol. 72:369–387.Google Scholar
Gui, F. R., Guo, J. Y., and Wan, F. H. 2006. Genetic variation among populations of Ageratina adenophora at diferent geographical locations in China. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sinica. 21 (5):72–78. [In Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Halpern, S. L. 2005. Sources and consequences of seed size variation in Lupinus perennis (Fabaceae): adaptive and non-adaptive hypotheses. Am. J. Bot. 92:205–231.Google Scholar
International Seed Testing Association 1999. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol. 27(suppl).333.Google Scholar
Lu, P., Sang, W. G., and Ma, K. P. 2006. Effects of environmental factors on germination and emergence of Crofton weed (Eupatorium adenophorum). Weed Sci. 54:452–457.Google Scholar
Maron, J. L., Vilà, M., Bommarco, R., Elmendorf, S., and Beardsley, P. 2004. Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecol. Monogr. 74:261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcgraw, J. B. and Vavrek, M. C. 1989. The role of buried viable seeds in artic and alpine plant communities. Pages 91–106. in Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T., and Simpson, R. L. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, S. E. and Allen, P. S. 1999. Ecological genetics of seed germination regulation in Bromus tectorum L. I. Phenotypic variance among and within populations. Oecologia. 120:27–34.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. E., Allen, P. S., and Beckstead, J. 1997. Seed germination regulation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae) and its ecological significance. Oikos. 78:474–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, S. E., McArthur, E. D., and Jorgensen, G. L. 1989. Variation in germination response to temperature in rabbitbrush (Charysothamnus nauseosus: Asteraceae) and its ecological implications. Am. J. Bot. 76:981–991.Google Scholar
Michaels, H. J., Benner, B., Hartgerink, A. P., Lee, T. D., Rice, S., Willson, M., and Bertin, R. I. 1989. Seed size variation: magnitude, distribution, and ecological correlates. Evol. Ecol. 2:157–166.Google Scholar
Shen, Y. X. and Liu, W. Y. 2004. Persistent soil seed bank of Eupatorium adenophorum . Acta Phytoecol. Sin. 28:768–772. [In Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Sultan, S. E. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot. Needand. 44:363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilki, F. and Dirik, H. 2007. Seed germination of three provenances of Pinus brutia (Ten.) as influenced by stratification, temperature and water stress. J. Environ. Biol. 28:133–136.Google Scholar
Tripathi, R. S. and Khan, M. L. 1990. Effects of seed weight and microsite characterististics on germination and seedling fitness in two species of Quercus in a subtropical wet hill forest. Oikos. 57:289–296.Google Scholar
Vera, M. L. 1997. Effects of altitude and seed size on germination and seedling survival of heathland plants in north Spain. Plant Ecol. 133:101–106.Google Scholar
Wang, M. and Yu, L. X. 2001. Climatic resource advantage and type zoning for planting daye-teain the Ailao Mountain. Chin. J. Agrometeorol. 22:47–50. [In Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Wang, M. L. and Feng, Y. L. 2005. The effects of soil nitrogen levels on morphology, biomass allocation and photosynthesis in Ageratina adenophora and Chromoleana odorata . Acta Phytoecol. Sin. 29:697–705. [In Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Wang, R. and Wang, Y-Z. 2006. Invasion dynamics and potential spread of the invasive alien plant species Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae) in China. Divers. Distrib. 12:397–408.Google Scholar
Wang, W. Q., Wang, J. J., and Zhao, Z. M. 2006. Seed population dynamics and germination characteristics of Eupatorium adenophorum . Chin. J. App1. Ecol. 17:982–986. [In Chinese with English abstract].Google ScholarPubMed
Weber, E. and Schmid, B. 1998. Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. Am. J. Bot. 85:1110–1121.Google Scholar
Williams, D. G., Mack, R. N., and Black, R. A. 1995. Ecophysiology of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology. 76:1569–1580.Google Scholar
Wulff, R. D. 1995. Environment maternal effects on seed quality and germination. Pages 491–505. in Kigel, J. and Galili, G. Seed Development and Germination. New York Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Zhang, C. L., Li, Y. P., Feng, Y. L., Zheng, Y. L., and Lei, Y. B. 2008. The roles of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation in Eupatorium adenophorum invasions in different altitude habitats. Acta Ecol. Sin. In press. [In Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. R., Xie, Z. X., Gao, Y., Jiang, L. H., Shimizuand, H., and Tobe, K. 2004. Germination response of Caragana korshinskii Kom. to light, temperature and water stress. Ecol. Res. 19:553–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H., Shi, J. P., and Zhao, C. J. 2005. Species composition, physiognomy and plant diversity of the tropical montane evergreen broad-leaved forest in southern Yunnan. Biodivers. Conserv. 14:2855–2870.Google Scholar