Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T22:09:45.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of 2,4-D on Rapeseed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. Betts and
R. Ashford
M. Betts
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask., S7N-0W0, Canada
R. Ashford
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask., S7N-0W0, Canada
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to compare the effects of 0.07, 0.14, 0.28, and 0.56 kg/ha of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] amine on plant growth, seed production, and seed quality when applied at four growth stages of summer rape (Brassica napus L. ‘Zephyr’) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris L. ‘Span’). At all growth stages, seed yield of turnip rape, was significantly reduced by each additional increment of 2,4-D. The difference in response of the two species may relate in part to differences in spray droplet retention of the leaf surfaces. The herbicide did not affect the germination of harvested seed although treatment with the higher rates at the bolting and flowering stages resulted in the production of some shrivelled seed that was lost on cleaning. Some herbicide treatments caused a marked increase in size of harvested seed. There was a trend towards decreased seed oil content with increasing rate of 2,4-D at the bolting and flowering stages, but oil production losses were mainly reflected through losses in seed yield. The time required for both species to reach maturity increased with increasing rate of herbicide when applied at the vegetative stages. In additional field studies, 2,4-D significantly reduced seed yield in turnip rape when applied at the 3- to 4-leaf stage at 0.035 kg/ha, and 0.018 kg/ha sometimes produced visible effects without noticeable loss in yield.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , July 1976, pp. 356 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Akesson, N.B. and Yates, W.E. 1964. Problems relating to application of agricultural chemicals and resulting drift residues. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 9:285–318.Google Scholar
2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1970. Official methods of analysis. 11th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Wash., D.C. 1015 pp.Google Scholar
3. Crafts, A.S. 1961. The chemistry and mode of action of herbicides. Interscience Publishers, New York. 269 pp.Google Scholar
4. Deacon, E.L. 1949. Vertical diffusion in the lowest layers of the atmosphere. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 75:89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Downey, R.K., Klassen, A.J., and McAnash, J. 1974. Rapeseed, Canada's “Cinderella” Crop. 3rd ed. Rapeseed Association of Canada. 15 pp.Google Scholar
6. Ennis, W.B. Jr., Williamson, R.E., and Dorschner, K.P. 1952. Studies on spray retention by leaves of different plants. Weeds 1:274–86.Google Scholar
7. Fribourg, H.A. and Johnson, I.J. 1955. Response of soybean strains to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Agron. J. 47:171–174.Google Scholar
8. Greenshields, J.E.R. and Putt, E.D. 1958. The effects of 2,4-D spray drift on sunflowers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 38:234–240.Google Scholar
9. Greenshields, J.E.R. and White, W.J. 1954. The effects of 2,4-D spray drift on sweet clover plants in the second year of growth. Can. J. Agr. Sci. 34:639–641.Google Scholar
10. Hansen, J.R. and Freeman, J.F. 1951. Herbicidal tolerance of soybean to post-emergence sprays. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rep. 8:85–86.Google Scholar
11. Loustalot, A.J. and Muzik, T.J. 1953. The effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on apparent photosynthesis and developmental morphology of velvet bean. Bot. Gaz. 115:56–66.Google Scholar
12. Maybank, J. and Yoshida, K. 1969. Delineation of herbicide drift hazards on the Canadian prairies. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 12:759–762.Google Scholar
13. Oyer, E.B. and Lee, O.C. 1950. Response of soybeans (Lincoln variety) to post-emergence spray of 2,4-D. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rep. 7:122–123.Google Scholar
14. Rojas-Garciduenas, M. and Kommedahl, T. 1958. The effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on radicle development and stem anatomy of soybean. Weeds 6:49–51.Google Scholar
15. Sinha, N.S. and Agrawal, P.N. 1963. Studies on development of oil in rai and yellow sarson. Indian Oilseeds J. 7:269.Google Scholar
16. Slife, F.W. 1956. The effect of 2,4-D and several other herbicides on weeds and soybeans when applied as post-emergence sprays. Weeds 4:61–68.Google Scholar
17. Smith, R.J. Jr. 1965. Effects of chlorophenoxy herbicides on soybeans. Weeds 13:168–169.Google Scholar
18. Thompson, L. Jr. and Egli, D.B. 1973. Evaluation of seedling progeny of soybeans treated with 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, and dicamba. Weed Sci. 22:141–144.Google Scholar
19. Wax, L.M., Kruth, L.A., and Slife, F.W. 1969. Response of soybeans to 2,4-D, dicamba and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:388–393.Google Scholar