Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T23:59:55.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting EPTC Injury to Navy Bean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald L. Wyse,
William F. Meggitt and
Donald Penner
Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
William F. Meggitt
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55101
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Injury to navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) was investigated as a function of soil moisture, planting depth, soil compaction, temperature, available nitrogen, and seed quality. Experiments in the greenhouse and growth chamber showed that both high and low moisture stress increased injury. Deep planting increased the injury from high rates of EPTC. Soil compaction alone reduced plant growth. In combination with EPTC at 4.5 kg/ha, further growth reduction was observed. Ambient temperature did not alter susceptibility to EPTC. Stimulation of growth by nitrogen as measured by increased fresh weight was inhibited by EPTC. Field and greenhouse studies showed that EPTC injury was greater to mechanically damaged seed than non-damaged seed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1976, pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, R.S. Jr. and Espinoza, W.G. 1969. Effect of phosphorus and atrazine on mineral composition of soybeans. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17:818–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Allison, L.E. 1952. Effect of synthetic polyelectrolytes on the structure of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci. 73:443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Audus, L.J. 1964. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press Inc., New York, N.Y. 555 p.Google Scholar
4. Carns, A. 1934. Soil crust. Agr. Eng. 15:167–169.Google Scholar
5. Carroll, J.C. 1943. Effects of drought, temperature, and nitrogen on turf grasses. Plant Physiol. 18:19–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Drew, L.O. and Buckele, W.F. 1963. Emergence force of plants. Proc. Am. Soc. Agr. Engr. Trans. Paper No. 62:641.Google Scholar
7. Edwards, F.E. 1966. Cotton seedling emergence. Mississippi Farm Res. 29(11):4–5.Google Scholar
8. Fang, S.C., Theisen, P., and Freed, V.H. 1961. Effects of water evaporation, temperature and rates of application on the retention of ethyl-N,N-di-n-propylthiocarbamate on various soils. Weeds 9:569–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Garner, T.H. and Bowen, H.D. 1966. Plant mechanics in seedling emergence. Am. Soc. Agr. Engr. Trans. 9(5):T650–653.Google Scholar
10. Gray, R.A. 1965. A vapor trapping apparatus for determining the loss of EPTC and other herbicides from soils. Weeds 13:138–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gray, R.A. and Weierich, A.J. 1965. Factors affecting the vapor loss of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hawxby, K., Basler, E., and Santelmann, P.W. 1971. Temperature effects on absorption and translocation of trifluralin in peanut seedlings. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. p. 24–25.Google Scholar
13. Koslowski, T.T., Sasaki, S., and Torrie, J.H. 1967. Influence of temperature on phytotoxicity of triazine herbicides to pine seedlings. Amer. J. Bot. 54:790–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Pellett, H.M. and Roberts, E.C. 1963. Effect of mineral nutrition on high temperature induced growth retardation of Kentucky bluegrass. Agron. J. 55:473–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Penner, D. and Graves, D. 1972. Temperature influence on herbicide injury to navy beans. Agron. J. 64:30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Penner, D. 1971. Effect of temperature on phytotoxicity and root uptake of several herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:571–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Pollack, T., Furtick, W.R., and Crabtree, G. 1973. Response of beans to fluorodifen under certain soil and light conditions. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. p. 13.Google Scholar
18. Richards, L.A. 1953. Modulus of rupture as an index of crusting soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 17:321–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Thompson, L. Jr., Slife, F.W., and Butler, H.S. 1970. Environmental influence on the tolerance of corn to atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:509–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Upchurch, R.P., Ledbetter, G.R., and Selman, F.L. 1963. The interaction of phosphorus with the phytotoxicity of soil applied herbicides. Weeds 11:36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Waters, E.C. Jr. and Atkins, J.D. 1959. Performance of snapbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris) seedlings having transversely broken cotyledons. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 74:591–596.Google Scholar
22. Wright, T.H. and Rieck, C.E. 1974. Factors affecting butylate injury to corn. Weed Sci. 22:83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Wyse, D., Meggitt, W.F., and Penner, D. 1971. Factors influencing the response of navy beans to EPTC. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 26:52.Google Scholar