Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T06:36:39.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fluometuron in Soil Solution as an Indicator of Its Efficacy in Three Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael G. Patterson ,
Gale A. Buchanan ,
Robert H. Walker  and
Richard M. Patterson
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Gale A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Agr. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Richard M. Patterson
Affiliation:
Res. Data Anal., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of fluometuron [1,1-dimethyl-3-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)urea] in soil solution after application of 0.5 or 1.0 ppmw revealed up to five-fold differences among three Alabama soils (Lucedale fine sandy loam, Decatur silty clay loam, and Sacul loam). Differences in fluometuron in soil solution were attributed to variable organic matter present and clay fractions. Fluometuron concentration in soil solution for each soil correlated well with control of four broadleaf weed species in a field experiment.

Keywords

Substituted ureadisplacementsoil water

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 6 , November 1982 , pp. 688 - 691
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, F. 1974. Soil solution. Pages 441–452 in Carson, E. W., ed. The Plant Root and Its Environment. Univ. Press of Va. Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
2. Adams, Fred, Burmester, C., Hue, N. V., and Long, L. F. 1980. A comparison of column-displacement and centrifuge methods of obtaining soil solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 44:733–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bailey, G. W. and White, J. L. 1964. Review of adsorption and desorption of organic pesticides by soil colloids, with implications concerning pesticide bioactivity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 12:324–332.Google Scholar
4. Bozarth, G. A. and Funderburk, H. H. 1971. Degradation of fluometuron in sandy loam soil. Weed Sci. 19:691–695.Google Scholar
5. Gillman, G. P. 1976. A centrifuge method for obtaining soil solution. Div. of Soils Divisional Rep. No. 16. Commonwealth Sci. and Industrial Res. Organization, Australia. pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
6. Hiltbold, A. E. and Buchanan, G. A. 1977. Influence of soil pH on persistence of atrazine in the field. Weed Sci. 25:515–520.Google Scholar
7. Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D. 1975. Page 209 in Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Marcel Dekker, Publ. New York.Google Scholar
8. Lafleur, K. S. 1973. Fluometuron-soil-solvent interactions. Soil Sci. 116:376–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Black, C. A. (ed.). 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. Parts 1 and 2. Agronomy 9. Am. Soc. of Agron., Madison, WI. 1572 pp.Google Scholar
10. Ogle, R. E. and Warren, G. F. 1965. Fate and activity of herbicides in soils. Weeds 13:257–273.Google Scholar
11. Parker, F. W. 1921. Methods of studying the concentration and composition of the soil solution. Soil Sci. 12:209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Scott, D. C. and Weber, J. B. 1967. Herbicide phytotoxicity as influenced by absorption. Soil Sci. 104.151–158.Google Scholar
13. Upchurch, R. P. 1958. The influence of soil factors on the phytotoxicity and plant selectivity of diuron. Weeds 6:161–171.Google Scholar
14. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:9–14.Google Scholar