Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T10:01:49.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicidal Activity as Affected by Soil Incorporation and Rainfall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. F. Wiese and
D. T. Smith
A. F. Wiese
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ., U. S. Dep. Agr. Southwestern Great Plains Res. Center, Bushland, Texas
D. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ. Agr. Res. and Ext. Center at Lubbock, Texas
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under the erractic rainfall distribution of the Southern Great Plains, average pigweed (Amaranthus sp.) control in five studies with seven herbicides was enhanced by incorporation in 1 or 3 inches of soil with a power rototiller. Compared to no incorporation, 9-inch incorporation improved pigweed control with two herbicides, had no effect on weed control with two others, and decreased weed control with another three. Soil incorporation at 1 or 3 inches did not increase weed control with three compounds if 0.4 inch of rainfall occurred within 2 weeks after application. Incorporation into 1 or 3 inches of soil improved weed control with four herbicides even when rainfall occurred within 2 days after application. In four of the trials, neither herbicides nor incorporation depth affected cotton stand or vigor. Under the soil moisture conditions prevailing in the one trial where yield data were obtained, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) stand and lint yield decreased lineally with depth of soil incorporation. Herbicides did not affect cotton stand or yield.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , July 1970, pp. 515 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Jordan, L. S., Coggins, C. W. Jr., Day, B. E., and Clerx, W. A. 1964. Photodecomposition of substituted phenylureas. Weeds 12:1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Jordan, I. S., Day, B. E., and Clerx, W. A. 1964. Photodecomposition of triazines. Weeds 12:5–6.Google Scholar
3. Knake, E. L., Appleby, A. P., and Furtick, W. R. 1967. Soil incorporation and site of uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weeds 15:228–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Orr, J. E., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1969. The effect of incorporation procedure on nitralin activity. Proc. So. Weed Sci. Soc. 17:42.Google Scholar
5. Parker, C. 1966. The importance of shoot entry in the action of herbicides applied to soil. Weeds 14:117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Wiese, A. F. and Hudspeth, E. B. Jr. 1968. Subsurface application and shallow incorporation of herbicides in cotton. Weed Sci. 16:494–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Wiese, A. F., Chenault, E. W., and Hudspeth, E. B. Jr. 1969. Incorporation of preplant herbicides for cotton. Weed Sci. 17:481–483.Google Scholar
8. Wright, W. L. and Warren, G. F. 1965. Photochemical decomposition of trifluralin. Weeds 13:329–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar