Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T17:45:41.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leaf Wash Techniques for Estimation of Foliar Absorption of Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Malcolm D. Devine
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T6G 2P5
Hank D. Bestman
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T6G 2P5
Chris Hall
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T6G 2P5
William H. Vanden Born
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T6G 2P5

Abstract

Three wash techniques, each with 1, 10, or 95% (v/v) ethanol:water were used to measure foliar absorption of 14C-glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine], 14C-3,6-dichloropicolinic acid, and 14C-chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} in Tartary buckwheat [Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. ♯3 FAGTA], Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. ♯ CIRAR], and barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Galt’). For the herbicides and species tested, the most suitable common procedure for determining absorption consisted of a double or triple rinse with or immersion in 10% ethanol. Wiping the treated leaves with cotton balls moistened with the solvent was much less effective. Efficiency of herbicide removal by a given solvent was not related consistently to solubility of the herbicide in the solvent.

Information

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable