Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T22:46:05.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence Control of Red Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William L. Barrentine,
Joe E. Street and
Mark E. Kurtz
William L. Barrentine
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Joe E. Street
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Mark E. Kurtz
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mefluidide {N-[2,4-dimethyl-5-[[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl] amino] phenyl] acetamide}+bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] at 0.14 + 0.84 kg ai/ha was the most injurious of five herbicide treatments applied once to one- to two-leaf red rice (Oryza sativa L. ♯3 ORYSA). The most injurious treatment to five-to six-leaf red rice was DPX Y6202 {ethyl [2-[4-[6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl]oxy]phenoxy] propionate} at 0.56 kg ai/ha. Two applications, regardless of red rice growth stage, of all treatments except fluazifop {[±]-butyl-2-[4-[[5-trifluoromethyl]-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoate} resulted in 86 to 99% injury.

Keywords

SoybeansfluazifopsethoxydimDPX Y6202haloxyfopdomestic riceORYSA

Information

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , November 1984, pp. 832 - 834
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1983. Weed control guidelines for Mississippi. Miss. Agric. and Forest. Exp. Stn., Miss. State Univ. 173 pp.Google Scholar
2. Chandler, J. M. 1982. Susceptibility of nine bermudagrass biotypes to postemergence herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:93.Google Scholar
3. Doll, J. D., Simkins, G. S., Bhowmik, P. C., and Drost, D. C. 1983. Selective postemergence quackgrass (Agropyron repens L.) control in soybeans. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Pages 8–9.Google Scholar
4. Driver, J. and Frans, R. E. 1982. Selective postemergence control of johnsongrass in soybeans and cotton. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 35:27.Google Scholar
5. Kurtz, M. E. 1982. Evaluation of seven experimental herbicides for johnsongrass control in cotton. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 10.Google Scholar
6. Mosier, D. G., Oliver, L. R., and Howe, O. W. 1982. A comparison of new postemergence herbicides for control of annual grasses. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:92.Google Scholar
7. Smith, R. J. 1979. How to control the hard-to-kill weeds in rice. Weeds Today 10(1):12–14.Google Scholar
8. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics–A Biometrical Approach, (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar