Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:53:43.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative Volatilities of Ester and Amine Forms of 2,4-D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. Grover
R. Grover*
Affiliation:
Herbicide Behavior in the Environment Section, Res. Sta. Agriculture Canada, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 3A2. Canada
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relative volatilities of various technical and formulated ester and amine salts of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] were determined in a closed air-flow system consisting of a volatilization chamber and an ethylene glycol trap. The system was operated at a flow rate of 28.8 L/hr and a temperature of 30 C. Trapped herbicide vapor was analyzed by gas chromatography. The relative volatilities of technical grade iso-propyl, butyl, propylene glycol butyl ether, and iso-octyl esters, were 56, 25 to 38, 4, and 1, respectively. The relative volatilities of various formulated esters and amines were of the magnitude of 440:33:1 for the high volatile, low volatile, and amine salts, respectively.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1976, pp. 26 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Carter, E.P. 1960. Volatility of ester forms of hormone type herbicides, III. J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chem. 43:367–370.Google Scholar
2. Freed, V.H. and Witt, J.M. 1969. Physicochemical principles in formulating pesticides relating to biological activity p. 70–80. in Gould, R.F. ed. Pesticide Formulation Research, Adv. in Chem. Ser. No. 86, Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Grover, R. 1975. A method for determining the volatility of herbicides. Weed Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
4. Gückel, W., Rittig, F.R., and Synnatschke, G. 1974. A method for determining the volatility of active ingredients used in plant protection. II. Application to formulated products. Pestic. Sci. 5:393–400.Google Scholar
5. Leasure, J.K. 1958. A study of some bioassay methods for herbicide volatility. Weed Sci. 6:310–314.Google Scholar
6. Marth, P.C. and Mitchell, J.W. 1949. Comparative volatility of various forms of 2,4-D. Bot. Gaz. 110:632–636.Google Scholar
7. Mullison, W.R. 1949. The volatility of several salts and esters of 2,4-D as determined by the response of tomato, bean, and cotton plants. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 53:281–290.Google Scholar
8. Warren, J.C.R. and Gillies, A. 1952. Volatility of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T esters. Proc. Natl. Weed Comm. (Canada). East. Sect. p. 98–101.Google Scholar