Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T18:03:49.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revegetation Following Massive Application of Selected Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. R. Isensee,
W. C. Shaw,
W. A. Gentner,
C. R. Swanson,
B. C. Turner and
E. A. Woolson
A. R. Isensee
Affiliation:
Agricultural Environmental Quality Inst., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agr., Beltsville, MD 20705
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This investigation was initiated in 1954 at Beltsville, Maryland, to determine the initial and long-term response of vegetation to, and persistence of, massive quantities of herbicides. Vegetative responses were determined 1, 2, 3, and 15 years after treatment. Residual phytotoxicity and herbicide residues were determined 14 years after treatment with bioassay and chemical analysis. After 3 years, revegetation was nearly complete in plots treated with massive (up to 400 times recommended agricultural rates) quantities of fenuron (1,1-dimethyl-3-phenylurea), monuron [3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid), chlorpropham (isopropyl m-chlorocarbanilate), sodium chlorate, 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid], borax, sodium chlorate plus borax, and 2,4-D plus borax. Only diuron [3-(3,4-di chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], DMU [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methylurea] sodium arsenite, and sodium arsenite plus sodium chlorate gave residual control of vegetation for more than 3 years. Revegetated plots were identical to untreated check plots whether the vegetation was initially killed by chemical or mechanical methods. Phytotoxic soil residues of DMU, diuron, and arsenate were present 14 years after application.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , September 1973, pp. 409 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Crafts, A. S. and Drever, H. 1960. Experiments with herbicides in soils. Weeds 8:12–18.Google Scholar
2. Crafts, A. S. and Harvey, W. A. 1955. Weed control by soil sterilization. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 446. 20 p.Google Scholar
3. Geissbühler, H. 1969. The substituted ureas. Pages 79–111 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Degradation of herbicides. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. 1955. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93–104.Google Scholar
5. Jansen, L. L., Danielson, L. L., Ennis, W. B. Jr., Frank, P. A., Holstun, J. T. Jr., Klingman, D. L., Paulling, J. R., Wearne, R. A., and Fox, A. S. 1972. Extent and cost of weed control with herbicides and an evaluation of important weeds, 1968. U.S. Dep. Agr., ARS-H-1, 227 pp.Google Scholar
6. Peterson, G. W. and Corey, R. B. 1966. A modified Chang and Jackson procedure for routine fractionation of inorganic soil phosphates. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 30:563–565.Google Scholar
7. Sheets, T. J. 1964. Review of disappearance of substituted urea herbicides from soil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Sigler, W. V. Jr. and Andrews, Henry. 1961. Residual effects of soil sterilants. Proc. S. Weed Conf. 14:273–286.Google Scholar
9. Thompson, W. T. 1967. Agricultural Chemicals—Book II. Herbicides. Thompson Publications, Davis, California, 252. pp.Google Scholar
10. Weise, A. F. 1960. Category B—Soil sterilization. Proc. S. Weed Conf. 13:390–396.Google Scholar
11. Woolson, E. A., Axley, J. H., and Kearney, P. C. 1971. Correlation between available soil arsenic, estimated by six methods, and response of corn (Zea mays L.). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 35:101–105.Google Scholar