Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T11:50:42.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation Analysis of Weed Population Dynamics in Ridge-Tilled fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Nicholas Jordan
Nicholas Jordan*
Affiliation:
Div. of Sci., Northeast Missouri State Univ., Kirksville, MO 63501
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effects of nonchemical weed control on weed and seedbank demography in ridge-tilled fields were simulated to examine long-term effects on weed population dynamics. Ridge tillage entails active seedbank management, including removal of much of the seedbank from the crop growth zone (ridge) to the interridge zone (furrow) at planting, and other seedbank manipulations. Dynamics of simulated yellow foxtail and velvetleaf populations were sharply sensitive to the rate of seed removal from the ridge. Variation in winter seed survival, ridge plant demography (emergence, survival, and seed production), and seed survival in the furrow after removal from the ridge also had strong effects on simulated dynamics. To prevent rapid population growth in a simulated corn-soybean rotation, very effective control of seedlings emerging with each crop was necessary to offset seed production from seedlings emerging after ridge rebuilding in corn years. Dynamics of both species were highly sensitive to cultivation efficiency. Effective “rescue” weed control must be available to prevent sharp increases in weed seedbanks during years when cultivation is ineffective.

Keywords

Yellow foxtail, Setaria lutescens (L.) Beauv. #3 SETLUvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik # ABUTHWeed demographyseedbank dynamicsconservation tillagenonchemical weed controlpopulation modelingpersistent seedbank speciestransient seedbank speciesAbutilon theophrasti ABUTHSetaria lutescens SETLU

Information

Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 468 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Caswell, H. 1989. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation, Ch. 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H. and Bruns, Y. F. 1975. Longevity of barnyardgrass, green foxtail, and yellow foxtail seeds in soil. Weed Sci. 23:437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Forcella, F. and Lindstrom, M. J. 1988a. Movement and germination of weed seeds in ridge-till crop production systems. Weed Sci. 36:56–59.Google Scholar
4. Forcella, F. and Lindstrom, M. J. 1988b. Weed seed populations in ridge and conventional tillage. Weed Sci. 36:500–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. List, G. A. and Kells, J. J. 1985. Weed control strategies for ridge-till-planted field crops. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:95.Google Scholar
6. Lueschen, W. E. and Anderson, R. N. 1980. Longevity of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds in soil under agricultural practices. Weed Sci. 28:341–346.Google Scholar
7. Nester, P. R., Harger, T. R., and Geaghan, J. P. 1984. Itchgrass (Rottboelia exaltata) response to control practices in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:165–168.Google Scholar
8. Pacala, S. W. and Silander, J. A. 1990. Field tests of neighborhood population dynamic models of two annual weed species. Ecol. Monogr. 60:113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Reeder, R., Oskan, E., and Eckert, D. 1989. Low-input ridge-tillage systems. Paper, Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 89–7013, 13 pp.Google Scholar
10. Roush, M. L., Jordan, N. R., and Holt, J. S. 1989. Ecological basis for weed biology in IPM. Pages 136–157 in National IPM Coordinating Committee, eds. Proceedings: National Integrated Pest Management Symposium/Workshop. National IPM Coordinating Committee, Communications Services. New York State Agric. Exp. Stn., Cornell Univ., Geneva, NY.Google Scholar
11. Schauer, A. 1991. The Thompson Farm On-Farm Research. Rodale Institute, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
12. Stoller, E. E. and Wax, L. M. Periodicity of germination and emergence of some annual weeds. Weed. Sci. 21:574–580.Google Scholar
13. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after six years of continuous corn (Zea mays) and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wicks, G. A. and Somerhalder, B. R. 1971. Effect of seedbed preparation on distribution of weed seed. Weed Sci. 19:666–668.Google Scholar