Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T03:41:50.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Smallseed Dodder (Cuscuta planiflora) Gravitropism in Red Light and in Red Plus Far-red

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gregory L. Orr,
Mustapha A. Haidar and
Deborah A. Orr
Gregory L. Orr
Affiliation:
Dep. Bioagric. Sci. & Pest Mngt., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Mustapha A. Haidar
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Prod. & Protect., American Univ., Beirut, Lebanon
Deborah A. Orr
Affiliation:
Tavelli Element., Poudre R-1 School District, Fort Collins, CO, 80524
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

White light-grown seedlings of smallseed dodder were cyclically irradiated from above with red light for 4 h followed by red plus far-red for 4 h. Tracings of initially nearly vertical, white light-grown seedlings were made from time-lapsed video images after four cycles of red light followed by red plus far-red. Stems of seedlings cycled into red light were negatively gravitropic and stems of seedlings then cycled into red plus far-red became photoreversibly, positively gravitropic. Observations suggest gravitropic sign reversal in smallseed dodder is regulated by photochrome.

Keywords

Smallseed dodder, Cuscuta planiflora Tenore ♯ CVCPLCVCPLphotochrome

Information

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1996, pp. 795 - 796
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Brown, A. H. 1993. Circumnutations: From Darwin to Space Flights. Update on Plant Development. Plant Physiol. 101: 345–348.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. H., Musselman, L. J., Wolsinki, P., and Dörr, I. 1994. Biology and control of Cuscuta . Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 265–317.Google Scholar
Gaiser, J. C. and Lomax, T. L. 1993. The altered gravitropic response of the lazy-2-mutant of tomato is phytochrome regulated. Plant Physiol. 102: 339–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, J. W. 1990. Gravitropism. Pages 44–89 in Plant Tropisms and Other Growth Movements. Unwin Hyman, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Holmes, M. G. 1984. Light sources. Pages 43–80 in Smith, H. and Holmes, M. G., eds. Techniques in Photomorphogenesis. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hutchings, M. J. and de Kroon, H. 1994. Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Pages 159–238 in Begon, M. and Fitter, A., eds. Advances in Ecological Research, Vol. 25. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. K. 1990. Plant foraging: a marginal value model and coiling response in Cuscuta subinclusa . Ecol. 7: 1916–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, C. K. 1992. Resource choice in Cuscuta europea . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 12194–12197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kujawski, R. F. and Truscott, F. H. 1974. Photocontrol of hook opening in Cuscuta gronovii Willd. Plant Physiol. 53: 610–614.Google Scholar
Lane, H. C. and Kasperbauer, M. J. 1965. Photomorphogenic responses of dodder seedlings. Plant Physiol. 40: 109–116.Google Scholar
Liscum, E. and Hangarter, R. P. 1993. Genetic evidence that the red-absorbing form of phytochrome B modulates gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Physiol. 103: 15–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mancinelli, A. L. 1994. The physiology of phytochrome action. Pages 211–269 in Kendrick, R. and Kronenberg, G., eds. Photomorphogenesis in Plants, 2nd ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Mancinelli, A. L. and Rabino, I. 1978. The “high irradiance responses” of plant photomorphogenesis. Bot. Rev. 44: 129–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, H. 1994. Coaction between pigment systems. Pages 353–373 in Kendrick, R. and Kronenberg, G., eds. Photomorphogenesis in Plants, 2nd ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, A. B., Firn, R. D., and Digby, J. 1994. Gravitropic sign reversal a fundamental feature of the gravitropic perception or response mechanisms in some plant organs. J. Exp. Bot. 45: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quail, P. 1996. Phytochromes: photosensory perception and signal transduction. Proc. 18th Annu. Symp. Plant Physiol., Riverside, CA (in press).Google Scholar
Smith, H. 1995. Physiological and ecological function within the phytochrome family. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 289–315.Google Scholar
Stewart, G.R. and Press, M. C. 1990. The physiology and biochemistry of parasitic angiosperms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41: 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar