Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:15:16.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Herbicidal Activity from HOE 29152 and Diclofop Applied Postemergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. H. Dekker,
W. F. Meggitt and
P. F. Boldt
J. H. Dekker
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1
W. F. Meggitt
Affiliation:
Pesticide Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
P. F. Boldt
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The soil activity of foliar-applied HOE 29152 {2-[4-trifluoromethyl-phenoxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid} and diclofop {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid} on barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.] and yellow foxtail [Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] was evaluated in the greenhouse. HOE 29152 was applied at 0.1, 1.2, 2.4, and 3.5 kg/ha; and diclofop was applied at 0.5, 2.7, 4.9, and 7.2 kg/ha. Both compounds applied to roots or shoots before emergence reduced growth. Neither compound had much, if any, effect on the germination of barnyardgrass or yellow foxtail; however, the survival of both weed species that germinated in solutions of these two compounds was reduced. The number of seedlings surviving for both weed species was reduced by both compounds. Seedling survival from germination imbibition by diclofop and HOE 29152 was influenced by the presence of light at the time of seed germination.

Keywords

Echinochloa crus-galliSetaria lutescens

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , May 1981, pp. 314 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1973. Postemergence treatments for controlling volunteer corn and giant foxtail in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 28:52.Google Scholar
2. Andersen, R. N. 1976. Response of monocotyledons to HOE 22870 and HOE 23408. Weed Sci. 24:266–269.Google Scholar
3. Boldt, P. F. and Putnam, A. R. 1977. Annual grass control in vegetable crops with HOE 29152. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:25.Google Scholar
4. Brewster, B. D., Appleby, A. P., and Spinney, R. L. 1977. Control of Italian ryegrass and wild oats in winter wheat with HOE 23408. Agron. J. 68:911–913.Google Scholar
5. Chow, P. N. P. and Dorrell, D. G. 1979. Response of wild oat (Avena fatua), flax (Linum usitatissimum), and rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) to diclofop-methyl. Weed Sci. 27:212–215.Google Scholar
6. Freisen, H. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1976. HOE 23408, a new selective herbicide for wild oats and green foxtail in wheat and barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:567–578.Google Scholar
7. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1974. HOE 23408 for postemergence wild oat and foxtail control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 29:38.Google Scholar
8. Putnam, A. R., Love, A. P., and Rice, R. P. Jr. 1974. Control of annual grasses in vegetable crops with HOE 23408 and HOE 23870. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 29:74.Google Scholar
9. Rao, S. R. and Sweet, R. D. 1977. Weed and crop response to methyl 2-(4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy) propanoate (HOE 23408). II. Possible causes for differential response of grasses. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. No. 88.Google Scholar
10. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat (Avena fatua), and green foxtail (Setaria viridis . Weed Sci. 25:382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar