Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:34:53.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Moisture and Effectiveness of Preemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. L. Stickler,
E. L. Knake and
T. D. Hinesly
R. L. Stickler
Affiliation:
Danville Jr. College, Danville, Illinois
E. L. Knake
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
T. D. Hinesly
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relation between soil moisture and the effectiveness of preemergence herbicides for control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberii Herrm.) was studied under greenhouse conditions using surface soil from Drummer silty clay loam with 25, 31, and 37% moisture. Herbicides used were 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine (atrazine), ethyl N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC), 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (amiben), α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin), 2-chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide (propachlor), and 2-chloro-N-(methoxymethyl)-2',6'-diethyl-acetanilide (hereinafter referred to as CP 50144). The effectiveness of atrazine and EPTC was increased when soil moisture was raised from 25 to 31%, but no further increase was obtained at 37% moisture. Response to amiben increased linearly and response to trifluralin decreased linearly with increasing moisture. Increasing moisture within this range had little effect on propachlor or CP 50144.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1969, pp. 257 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Audus, L. J. 1964. Herbicide behavior in the soil. p. 111–161. In Audus, L. J. (ed.) The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press. New York.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. and Wooten, O. B. 1967. Equipment for evaluating methods of applying preemergence herbicides. Weeds 15:366–368.Google Scholar
3. Grover, R. 1966. Influence of organic matter, texture, and available water on the toxicity of simazine in soil. Weeds 14:148–152.Google Scholar
4. Knake, E. L., Bowers, W., and Butler, B. J. 1965. The effect of soil incorporation on atrazine and CDAA. NCWCC Res. Rept. 22:118–119.Google Scholar
5. Knake, E. L., Appleby, A. P., and Furtick, W. R. 1967. Soil incorporation and site of uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weeds 15:228–232.Google Scholar
6. Knake, E. L. and Wax, L. M. 1968. The importance of the shoot of giant foxtail for uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weeds 16:393–395.Google Scholar
7. Murray, Jacquelyn S., Schreiber, M. M., and Guard, A. T. 1967. Anatomy of the first internode of giant foxtail. Weeds 15:347–351.Google Scholar
8. Upchurch, R. P. 1957. The influence of soil-moisture content on the response of cotton to herbicides. Weeds 5:112–120.Google Scholar
9. Webber, L. R. and Elrick, D. E. 1966. Research needs for controlling soil pollution. Agr. Sci. Rev. 4:10–20.Google Scholar