Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T06:26:39.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Factors Affecting Herbicide Selectivity in Upland Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. Nangju,
D. L. Plucknett and
S. R. Obien
D. Nangju
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Soil Sci. of Univ. Hawaii, HI 96822
D. L. Plucknett
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Soil Sci. of Univ. Hawaii, HI 96822
S. R. Obien
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Soil Sci. of Univ. Hawaii, HI 96822
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several methods were used to overcome herbicide phytotoxicity to upland rice (Oryza sativa L., ‘IR8′). Seed pelleting with activated carbon and band application of activated carbon slurry over the rice seed were ineffective in reducing the toxicity of chloramben (3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid) and atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] to upland rice. In contrast, a 2.5-cm layer of activated carbon and vermiculite mixture (1:1) placed over the rice seed was effective in overcoming the toxicity of these herbicides. Deep sowing (3.0 to 4.5 cm) of rice seed was adequate in protecting upland rice from herbicides which are toxic to direct seeded, flooded rice but are not toxic to transplanted rice. The degree of protection from deep sowing, however, was determined by site of uptake, herbicide adsorption by soil, leaching, and inherent toxicity of the herbicides to rice seedlings.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1976, pp. 63 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Brenchley, R.G. 1968. Charcoal, a means of protecting crops in Oregon. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 22:10–11.Google Scholar
2. Burr, R.J., Lee, W.O., and Appleby, A.P. 1972. Factors affecting use of activated carbon to improve herbicide selectivity. Weed Sci. 20:180–183.Google Scholar
3. De Datta, S.K., Lacsina, R.Q., and Seaman, D.E. 1971. Phenoxy acid herbicides for barnyardgrass control in transplanted rice. Weed Sci. 19:203–207.Google Scholar
4. Gray, R.A. and Weierich, A.J. 1969. The importance of root, shoot, and seed exposure on the herbicidal activity of EPTC. Weed Sci. 17:223–229.Google Scholar
5. Harris, C.I. 1966. Adsorption, movement, and phytotoxicity of monuron and s-triazine herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 14:6–10.Google Scholar
6. Harris, C.I. 1967. Movement of herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 15:214–216.Google Scholar
7. International Rice Research Institute. 1965. Annual Report for 1964. Los Banos, Philippines. 357 pp.Google Scholar
8. International Rice Research Institute. 1968. Annual Report for 1967. Los Banos, Philippines. 402 pp.Google Scholar
9. International Rice Research Institute. 1969. Annual Report for 1968. Los Banos, Philippines. 266 pp.Google Scholar
10. International Rice Research Institute. 1971. Annual Report for 1970. Los Banos, Philippines. 238 pp.Google Scholar
11. Knake, E.L. and Wax, L.M. 1968. The importance of the shoot of giant foxtail for uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 16:393–395.Google Scholar
12. Kratky, B.A. and Warren, G.F. 1971. Activated carbon-vermiculite mixture for increasing herbicide selectivity. Weed Sci. 19:79–81.Google Scholar
13. Linscott, J.J., Burnside, O.C., and Lavy, T.L. 1969. Phytotoxicity and movement of amiben derivatives in soil. Weed Sci. 17: 170–174.Google Scholar
14. Linscott, D.L. and Hagin, R.D. 1967. Protecting Alfalfa seedlings from a triazine with activated charcoal. Weed Sci. 15:304–306.Google Scholar
15. Nangju, D., Plucknett, D.L., and Obien, S.R. 1973. Seed pelleting as an approach to herbicide selectivity in direct sown rice. Proc. 4th Asian Pac. Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. Rotorua, New Zealand. 2:465–480.Google Scholar
16. Nishimoto, R.K., Appleby, A.P., and Furtick, W.R. 1969. Plant response to herbicide placement in soil. Weed Sci. 17:475–478.Google Scholar
17. Obien, S.R. and Plucknett, D.L. 1970. Chloramben and five newer herbicides for weed control in transplanted rice. Proc. 10th Brit. Weed Cont. Conf. 711–717.Google Scholar
18. Obien, S.R., Plucknett, D.L., de la Pena, R.S., and Shibao, G.H. 1971. Weed control in direct-sown rice: Studies with benthiocarb, RP 17623 and MBR 76343. Proc. 3rd Asian-Pac. Weed Contr. Inter., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2:241–243.Google Scholar
19. Parker, C. 1966. The importance of shoot entry in the action of herbicides applied to the soil. Weed Sci. 14:117–121.Google Scholar
20. Smith, R.J. Jr. and Fox, W.T. 1971. Progress report of weed control in rice. Rice J. 74(6):35–37.Google Scholar