Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:31:55.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sorption and Mobility of Bentazon in Coastal Plain Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Timothy L. Grey,
Glenn R. Wehtje,
Ben F. Hajek and
Robert H. Walker
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ. AL 36849
Glenn R. Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ. AL 36849
Ben F. Hajek
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ. AL 36849
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ. AL 36849
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sorption and mobility of 14C-bentazon were evaluated using soil solution and soil-thin-layer chromatography, respectively on three Coastal Plain soils. The proportion of bentazon adsorbed, was pH and concentration dependent and ranged between 28 to 47, 31 to 61, and 17 to 68% for the Dothan loamy sand, Greenville clay, and Troup loamy sand, respectively. Bentazon sorption decreased as soil pH increased from 5.4 to 5.8 on the Troup loamy sand, regardless of bentazon concentration. Sorption of 1 and 10 ppm bentazon decreased as soil pH increased from 5.0 to 5.7 on the Greenville clay and 6.1 to 6.4 on the Dothan loamy sand. Bentazon was least mobile on the Greenville clay and mobility increased as pH increased. Mobility of bentazon was greatest on the Troup loamy sand and was not pH dependent. Bentazon mobility decreased as soil pH increased for the Dothan loamy sand.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,l,3-benzothiadiazin-4-(3H)-one 2,2-dioxideSorptionleachingsoil sorption

Information

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1996, pp. 166 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. and Wax, L. M. 1973. Bentazon mobility and absorption in twelve Illinois soils. Weed Sci. 21: 224–227.Google Scholar
2. Adams, F., Bumester, C., Hue, N. V., and Long, L. F. 1982. A comparison of column displacement and centrifuge methods of obtaining soil solution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 44: 733–735.Google Scholar
3. Ahrens, W. H. (editor). 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Weed Science Soc. of Am. 1508 West University Ave., Champaign, IL 61821.Google Scholar
4. Anonymous. 1979. Soil survey of Lee and Terrell counties, Georgia. USDA, University of Georgia, College of Agriculture.Google Scholar
5. Barnes, C. J., Goetz, A. J., and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Effects of imazaquin residues on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37: 820–824.Google Scholar
6. Bergstrom, L. F. and Jarvis, N. J. 1993. Leaching of dichlorprop, bentazon, and 36Cl in undisturbed field lysimeters of different agricultural soils. Weed Sci. 41: 251–261.Google Scholar
7. Bohn, H. L., McNeal, B. L., and O'Conner, G. A. 1985. Anion and molecular retention. Pages 184–207 in Soil Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
8. Childs, C. J. and Harris, M. C. 1979. Soil survey of Coffee County Alabama. USDA, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. Google Scholar
9. Dao, T. H., Marx, D. B., Lavy, T. L., and Dragun, J. 1982. Effect and statistical evaluation of soil sterilization of aniline and diuron sorption isotherms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46: 963–969.Google Scholar
10. Gan, J., Weimer, N. R., Koskinen, W. C., Buhler, D. D., Wyse, D. L., and Becker, R. L. 1994. Sorption and desorption of imazethapyr and 5-hydroxyimazethapyr in Minnesota soils. Weed Sci. 42: 92–97.Google Scholar
11. Gaynor, J. D. and Hamill, A. S. 1983. Bentazon preemergence activity on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic) and persistence in Southwestern Ontario soils. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63: 1015–1022.Google Scholar
12. Giles, C. H., MacEwan, T. H., Nakhwa, S. N., and Smith, D. Studies in sorption. Part XI. A system of classification of solution sorption isotherms, and its use in diagnosis of sorption mechanisms and in measurement of specific surface areas of solids. J. Chem. Soc. 1960:3973–3993.Google Scholar
13. Goetz, A. J., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G., and Hajek, B. F. 1989. Sorption and mobility of chlorimuron in Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 37: 428–433.Google Scholar
14. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G. R., and Hajek, B. F. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34: 788–793.Google Scholar
15. Harper, S. S. 1994. Sorption-desorption and herbicide behavior in soil. Pages 207–225 in Duke, S. O., (ed.) Rev. Weed Sci. 6. Weed Sci. Soc. of Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
16. Helling, S. C. and Turner, B. C. 1968. Pesticide mobility: Determination by soil thin-layer chromatography. Science 162: 562–563.Google Scholar
17. Hingston, F. J., Posner, A. M., and Quirk, J. P. 1972. Anion sorption by goethite and gibbsite. J. of Soil Sci. 23: 177–192.Google Scholar
18. Kislushko, P. M. 1982. Bentazon hydrolysis. Agrokhimiia 11: 127–130.Google Scholar
19. Kordel, W, Herrchen, M., and Klein, W. 1991. Experimental assessment of pesticide leaching using undisturbed lysimeters. Pestic. Sci. 31: 337–348.Google Scholar
20. Marsh, J. A., Wingfield, G. I., Davies, H. A., and Grossbard, E. 1978. Simultaneous assessment of various responses of the soil microflora to bentazon. Weed Res. 18: 294–300.Google Scholar
21. Mine, A., Hino, N., and Ueda, M. 1974. Studies on the herbicidial properties of bentazon under paddyfield conditions. II. Absorption and translocation in plants and behavior in soil. Weed Res. (Jpn.) 18: 5–10.Google Scholar
22. Otto, S., Beutel, P., Drescher, N., and Huber, R. 1979. Investigations into the degradation of bentazon in plant and soil. Pages 551–556. in Geissbuhler, H. (ed.) Advances in Pesticide Science. Vol. 3: Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.Google Scholar
23. Ross, L. J., Powell, S., Fleck, J. E., and Buecher, B. 1989. Dissipation of bentazon in flooded rice fields. J. Environ. Qual. 18: 105–109.Google Scholar
24. Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., Haderlie, L. C., and Slife, F. W. 1975. Bentazon leaching in four Illinois soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23: 682–684.Google Scholar
25. Tisdale, S. L., Werner, S. L., and Beaton, J. D. 1985. Basic soil-plant relationships. Pages 95–111 in Soil Fertility and Fertilizers, 4th edition: Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY.Google Scholar
26. Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1991. Influence of bentazon on the phototoxicity of paraquat to peanuts and associated weeds. Weed Sci 40: 90–95.Google Scholar
27. Wehtje, G. R., McGuire, J. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1986. Texas panicum control in peanuts with paraquat. Weed Sci. 34: 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts. Weed Sci. 37: 385–391.Google Scholar