Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T19:44:03.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Techniques for Greenhouse Evaluation of Herbicides on Saltcedar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P.C. Quimby Jr.,
E.B. Hollingsworth and
R.L. McDonald
P.C. Quimby Jr.
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Middle Rio Grande Branch Exp. Stn., New Mexico State Univ., 1036 Miller St., SW, Los Lunas, NM 87031
E.B. Hollingsworth
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Middle Rio Grande Branch Exp. Stn., New Mexico State Univ., 1036 Miller St., SW, Los Lunas, NM 87031
R.L. McDonald
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Middle Rio Grande Branch Exp. Stn., New Mexico State Univ., 1036 Miller St., SW, Los Lunas, NM 87031
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Subirrigated pot-plant systems were developed for greenhouse simulations of field methods being tested for herbicidal control of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra Pall.). The methods included: over-the-top spraying; soil injection; soil layering, with whole plants transplanted onto the herbicide layer; and soil layering by severing the roots and concomitantly injecting herbicide. Existing foliar application techniques were improved for greenhouse testing of herbicides and results from preliminary tests were apparently similar to literature reports of limited efficacy in the field. Preliminary results from these greenhouse techniques showed that root zone applications, either by soil layering or soil injection, were very effective; stem or foliar applications were less effective.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1977, pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Cords, H.P. and Badiei, A.A. 1964. Root reserves and susceptibility to systemic herbicides in two phreatophytes. Weeds 12:229–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hoagland, D.R. and Arnon, D.I. 1950. The Water-culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347, 32 pp.Google Scholar
3. Hollingsworth, E.B., Quimby, P.C. Jr., and Jaramillo, D.C. 1973. Root plow herbicide application as a new incorporation technique. Weed Sci. 21:128–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hughes, E.E. 1965. Basal and stump sprays for control of saltcedar. Weeds 13:338–340.Google Scholar
5. Hughes, E.E. 1966. Results of field applications of herbicides for control of saltcedar (Tamarix Spp.). U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., ARS 34–79, 15pp.Google Scholar
6. Hughes, E.E. 1966. Single and combination mowing and spraying treatments for control of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra, Pall.). Weeds 14:276–278.Google Scholar
7. Hughes, E.E. 1967. Chemical Screening Studies to Develop a Control for Saltcedar. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Crops Res. Div., CR-33-67, 19 pp.Google Scholar
8. Wilkinson, R.E. 1966. Reproduction of saltcedar by cuttings. Weeds 14:173–174.Google Scholar