Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:29:03.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triallate Antidotes for Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Patrick M. McMullan and
John D. Nalewaja
Patrick M. McMullan
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Weed Sci., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Weed Sci., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted to determine the effectiveness of dichlormid, R-29148, CGA-92194, flurazole, naphthalic anhydride, and MON-5500 as herbicide antidotes for triallate in wheat and to determine triallate antagonism by seed-applied fungicides and insecticides. Seed treatment of MON-5500 at 0.063% wt/wt was the most effective antidote for triallate in wheat in both greenhouse and field. Dichlormid and R-29148 at 0.5% wt/wt were more effective as antidotes for triallate in wheat than either CGA-92194 or naphthalic anhydride. Flurazole, as a seed treatment, did not reduce triallate injury to wheat Dichlormid or R-29148 at 2.2 kg ai ha–1 applied broadcast to soil and incorporated reduced injury to wheat from triallate at 1.1 kg ai ha–1 and also reduced injury to oats from 0.3 kg ha–1 triallate. Seed treatments of carboxin at 0.2% wt/wt or imazalil at 0.008% wt/wt antagonized triallate and decreased injury to wheat from triallate at 0.6 kg ha–1. Maneb plus lindane or mancozeb treatment of wheat seed increased injury from triallate.

Keywords

Triallate, S-(2,3,3-trichloro-2-propenyl)bis-(1-methylethyl)carbamothioateCGA-92194, α-[(1,3-dioxalan-2-yl-methoxy)imino]-benzeneacetonitriledichlormid, 2,2-dichloro-N,N-di-2-propenylacetamideflurazole, phenylmethyl 2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)-5-thiazolecarboxylateMON-5500, 4-(dichloromethylene)-2-[N-(α-methylbenzyl)imino]-1,3-dithiolane hydrochloridenaphthalic anhydride, 1H,3H-naphtho[1,8-cd]-pyran-1,3-dioneR-29148, 2,2-dimethyl-5-methyldichloroacetyloxazolidinecarboxin, 5,6-dihydro-2-methyl-1,4-oxathiin-3-carboxanilideimazalil, 1-[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-(2-propenyloxy)ethyl]-1H-imidazolelindane, γ-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro-cyclohexanemancozeb, manganous ethylenebisdithiocarbamate plus Znmaneb, manganous ethylenebisdithiocarbamatewheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Alex’ ‘Coteau’oats, Avena sativa L. # AVESA ‘Lyon’Herbicide protectantsafenersantagonismfungicides

Information

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 1991, pp. 57 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1971. Protecting corn from herbicide injury by seed treatment. Weed Sci. 19:565–568.Google Scholar
2. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
3. Gronwald, J. W., Fuerst, E. P., Eberlein, C. V., and Egli, M. A. 1987. Effect of herbicide antidotes on glutathione content and glutathione S-transferase activity of sorghum shoots. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 29:66–76.Google Scholar
4. Hatzios, K. K. 1984. Herbicide antidotes: development, chemistry, and mode of action. Adv. Agron. 36:265–316.Google Scholar
5. Hatzios, K. K. 1986. Interactions of the safener flurazole with chloroacetanilide and thiocarbamate herbicides on maize (Zea mays L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:353–359.Google Scholar
6. Hubbell, J. P. and Casida, J. E. 1977. Metabolic fate of the N,N-dialklylcarbamoyl moiety of thiocarbamate herbicides in rats and corn. J. Agric. Food Chem. 25:404–413.Google Scholar
7. Lay, M. M. and Casida, J. E. 1976. Dichloroacetamide antidotes enhance thiocarbamate sulfoxide detoxification by elevating corn root glutathione content and glutathione S-transferase activity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 6:442–456.Google Scholar
8. Leavitt, J. R. and Penner, D. 1978. Potential antidotes nst acetanilide herbicide to corn (Zea mays). Weed Res. 18:281–2.Google Scholar
9. Leavitt, J. R. and Penner, D. 1979. In vitro conjugation and other ols with acetanilide herbicides and EPTC sulfoxide and the action of the herbicide antidote R-25788. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:533–536.Google Scholar
10. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1980. Herbicide antidotes with triallate. Agron. J. 72:662–664.Google Scholar
11. Molberg, E. S., Friesen, G. A., McCurdy, E. V., and Dryden, R. D. 1964. Placement of di-allate and triallate for control of wild oats in wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 44:351–358.Google Scholar
12. Pallos, F. M., Gray, R. A., Arneklev, D. R., and Brokke, M. E. 1975. Antidotes protect corn from thiocarbamate herbicide injury. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:821–822.Google Scholar
13. Spotanski, R. F. and Burnside, O. C. 1973. Reducing herbicide injury to sorghum with crop protectants. Weed Sci. 21:531–536.Google Scholar
14. Stephenson, G. R., Bunce, N. J., Makowski, R. I., Bergsma, M. D., and Curry, J. C. 1979. Structure-activity relationships for antidotes to thiocarbamate herbicides in corn. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:543–547.Google Scholar
15. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Champaign, IL. Pages 423–425.Google Scholar