Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:00:49.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Venice Mallow Competition in Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. J. Eaton,
K. C. Feltner and
O. G. Russ
B. J. Eaton
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS. 66506
K. C. Feltner
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Kansas State Univ.
O. G. Russ
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS. 66506
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Competition studies were conducted with soybeans Glycine max. (L.) Merr. ‘Clark 63’ and Venice mallow (Hibiscus trionum L.). One Venice mallow per 7.5 cm of soybean row reduced soybean seed yield 632 kg/ha after 85 days competition. Thirty to 40-cm weed bands in and between soybean rows reduced yields 270 to 651 kg/ha with 35 to 40 days of competition. A natural stand of 215 Venice mallow plants per square meter reduced soybean yield 454 kg/ha after 30 days of competition, and competition up to 110 days reduced yield as much as 1490 kg/ha. Weed competition affected the number of pods per soybean plant more than any other seed-yield component, and soybean height was reduced. Soybean yields were reduced more when soil moisture was abundant early in the growing season and limited in late summer than when moisture was limited early in the growing season and above average until soybeans matured.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , March 1973, pp. 89 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C. and Colville, W. L. 1964. Yield components of soybeans as affected by mechanical, cultural and chemical weed control practices. Agron. J. 56:348–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. 1968. Control of wild cane in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:18–22.Google Scholar
3. Bush, L. P. and Staniforth, D. W. 1962. Shading effects of annual weeds in soybeans. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 19:46.Google Scholar
4. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.Google Scholar
6. Kust, C. A. and Smith, R. R. 1969. Interaction of linuron and row spacing for control of yellow foxtail and barnyardgrass in soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:489–491.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Moolani, M. K. and Slife, F. W. 1960. The competitive effects of various intensities of pigweed on the development of corn and soybeans. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 17:26.Google Scholar
9. Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Peters, E. J., Gerbhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F. 1965. Interrelations of row spacing, cultivations, and herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 13:285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Staniforth, D. W. and Weber, C. R. 1956. Effects of annual weeds on growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:467–471.Google Scholar
12. Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Soybean-foxtail competition under varying moisture conditions. Agron. J. 50:13–15.Google Scholar
13. Staniforth, D. W. 1962. Responses of soybean varieties to weed competition. Agron. J. 54:11–13.Google Scholar
14. Staniforth, D. W. 1965. Competitive effects of three foxtail species in soybeans. Weeds 13:191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Waldrep, T. W. and McLaughling, R. D. 1969. Cocklebur competition and control. Soybean Farmer 3(3):26–27, 30.Google Scholar
16. Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effects of row spacing on soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Weber, R. C. and Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Competitive relationship in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar