Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T10:54:32.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with Imazaquin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gregory R. Sims,
Glenn Wehtje,
John A. Mcguire and
Michael G. Patterson
Gregory R. Sims
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils
Glenn Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils
John A. Mcguire
Affiliation:
Res. Data Analysis
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field evaluations were made on the effects of imazaquin {2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid} on Florida beggarweed [Desmodium tortuosum (SW) DC. # DEDTO] and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOB) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop yield was reduced at 392 and 504 g ae/ha and with preemergence applications. Florida beggarweed control was not achieved with this herbicide. Maximum sicklepod control (approximately 80%) was achieved with 392 and 504 g/ha applied postemergence. In a separate study, several herbicide systems utilizing imazaquin were compared to a standard weed control program. All these systems provided weed control and yields that were comparable to the standard weed control system; thus the inclusion of imazaquin offered no advantage over the standard system.

Keywords

Desmodium tortuosumCassia obtusifoliaDEDTOCASOB

Information

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , September 1987, pp. 682 - 685
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Boswell, T. E. 1971. Postemergence weed control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:124–130.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A., Hauser, E. W., Ethridge, W. J., and Cecil, S. R. 1976. Competition of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod with peanuts II. Effects of cultivation, weeds, and SADH. Weed Sci. 24:29–39.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1982. Weeds and their control in peanuts. Pages 206–249 in Peanut Science and Technology, Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. American Peanut Res. and Educ. Soc., Inc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
4. Davidson, J. I. Jr., Whitaker, T. B., and Dickens, J. W. 1982. Grading, cleaning, storage, shelling, marketing of peanuts in the United States. Pages 571–623 in Peanut Science and Technology, Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. American Peanut Res. and Educ. Soc., Inc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
5. Gamble, B. E., Walker, R. H., and Harris, J. R. 1984. Response of weed species (Fabaceae) to DPX-F6025 and AC 252,214 applied preemergence. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:69.Google Scholar
6. Hauser, E. W. and Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Control of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod in peanuts with dinoseb. Peanut Sci. 2:40–44.Google Scholar
7. Hauser, E. W., Buchanan, G. A., and Ethridge, W. J. 1975. Competition of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod with peanuts I. Effects of periods of weed-free maintenance or weed competition. Weed Sci. 23:368–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hauser, E. W., Buchanan, G. A., Nichols, R. L., and Patterson, R. M. 1982. Effects of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield. Weed Sci. 30:602–604.Google Scholar
9. Henning, R. J., Allison, A. H., and Tripp, L. D. 1982. Cultural practices. Pages 123–138 in Peanut Science and Technology, Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. American Peanut Res. and Educ. Soc., Inc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
10. Ketchersid, M. L., Boswell, T. E., and Merckle, M. G. 1978. Effects of 2,4-DB on yield and pod development in peanuts. Peanut Sci. 5:35–39.Google Scholar
11. Umeda, K., Malefyt, T., Marc, P. A., and Orwick, P. L. 1984. Optimum timing of application of Scepter (TM) soybean herbicide for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) control: greenhouse studies. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:67.Google Scholar