Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T09:08:00.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applicators for a Weed Pathogen plus Acifluorfen in Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Khosro Khodayari,
Roy J. Smith Jr.,
Joel T. Walker and
David O. Tebeest
Khosro Khodayari
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas Rice Res. and Ext. Ctr., AR 72160
Roy J. Smith Jr.
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric, Stuttgart, AR 72160
Joel T. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Engineering, Fayetteville, AR 72701
David O. Tebeest
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathology, Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A low-volume (21.5 L/ha) spinning disc (controlled droplet applicator) and a high-volume (187 L/ha) boom-nozzle applicator were compared in applying tank mixtures of the weed pathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Sacc. f. sp.] aeschynomene (henceforth designated C.G.A.) and acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid} for control of northern jointvetch [Aeschynomene virginica (L.) B.S.P. # AESVI] and hemp sesbania [Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A.W. Hill # SEBEX] in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Tracy M’]. Application with a spinning disc did not increase control of either weed species over the boom-nozzle applicator. C.G.A. controlled northern jointvetch in 2 of 3 yr. Northern jointvetch control with the spinning-disc was poorer at lower rates in years of unfavorable environment. Acifluorfen at 0.56 kg ai/ha and applied with either applicator controlled hemp sesbania satisfactorily.

Keywords

Glycine maxColletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomenelow vs. high volume applicationintegrated weed controlbiological controlAESVISEBEX

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1987, pp. 37 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Boyette, C. D., Templeton, G. E., and Oliver, L. R. 1984. Texas gourd (Cucutbita texana) control with Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae . Weed Sci. 32:649–655.Google Scholar
2. Daniel, J. T., Templeton, G. E., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Fox, W. T. 1973. Biological control of northern jointvetch in rice with an endemic fungal disease. Weed Sci. 21:303–307.Google Scholar
3. Klerk, R. A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and TeBeest, D. O. 1985. Integration of a microbial herbicide into weed and pest control programs in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:95–99.Google Scholar
4. Lee, S. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1982. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds. Times and methods of application. Weed Sci. 30:520–526.Google Scholar
5. McWhorter, C. G., and Anderson, J. M. 1972. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:58–64.Google Scholar
6. Matthews, G. A. 1979. Equipment for controlled droplet application of pesticides. Int. Pest Control 21:139–142.Google Scholar
7. Matthews, G. A. 1982. New developments in pesticide-application technology. Crop Prot. 1(2). 131–145.Google Scholar
8. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1968. Weed competition in rice. Weed Sci. 16:252–255.Google Scholar
9. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1982. Integration of microbial herbicides with existing pest management programs. Pages 189–203 in Charudattan, R. and Walker, R. L., ed. Biological Control in Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
10. Smith, R. J. Jr., Flinchum, W. T., and Seaman, D. E. 1977. Weed control in U.S. rice production. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Handb. 497, U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
11. Walker, H. L. 1981. Fusarium lateritium: A pathogen of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 29:629–631.Google Scholar
12. Walker, H. L., and Riley, J. A. 1982. Evaluation of Alternaria cassiae for the biocontrol of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 30:651–654.Google Scholar