Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T00:47:50.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Herbicide Phytotoxicity with Covariance Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. Kent Harrison and
Emilie E. Regnier
S. Kent Harrison
Affiliation:
The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
Emilie E. Regnier
Affiliation:
The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the statistical precision of estimating herbicide dose-response treatment effects by covariance analysis (ANOCOVA) relative to standard analysis of variance (ANOVA). Analyses of corn seedling response to the translocated herbicides fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, and quizalofop at 10 to 60 g ai ha-1 indicated that treatment effects were estimated with 26 to 116% greater precision by ANOCOVA than ANOVA. Covariance analyses of treatment effects for corn response to the contact herbicides paraquat, acifluorfen, and lactofen at 50 to 300 g ai ha-1 gave 8 to 13% greater precision than ANOVA. Gains in precision by ANOCOVA for all experiments were generally greatest when shoot dry weight was analyzed as the response variable and pretreatment fifth leaf length served as the covariate.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidfluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidlactofen, (±)-2-ethoxy-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl-5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoateparaquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ionquizalofop, (±)-2-[4-(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onecorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3352’Acifluorfenfluazifop-Plactofenparaquatquizalofopsethoxydim

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1990, pp. 828 - 832
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Chatterjee, S., and Price, B. 1977. Regression Analysis by Example. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 117.Google Scholar
2. Cochran, W. G. 1957. Analysis of covariance: its nature and uses. Biometrics 13:261–282.Google Scholar
3. Cox, D. R. and McCullagh, P. 1982. Some aspects of analysis of covariance. Biometrics 38:541–561.Google Scholar
4. Dawkins, H. C. 1983. Multiple comparisons misused: why so frequently in response-curve studies? Biometrics 39:789–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fisher, R. A. 1982. Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 4th Ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
6. Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, Second Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 424–457.Google Scholar
7. Hoppe, H. H. 1989. Fatty acid biosynthesis–a target site of herbicide action. p. 65–83 in Böger, P. and Sandmann, G., eds. Target Sites of Herbicide Action. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
8. Kunert, K. J. and Dodge, A. D. 1989. Herbicide-induced radical damage and antioxidative systems. p. 45–63 in Böger, P. and Sandmann, G., eds. Target Sites of Herbicide Action. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
9. Little, T. M., and Hills, F. J. 1978. Agricultural Experimentation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, p. 283–293.Google Scholar
10. Ormrod, D. P., Tingey, D. T., and Gumpertz, M. 1983. Covariate measurements for increasing the precision of plant response to O3 and SO2 . HortScience 18:896–898.Google Scholar
11. Samford, M. R. 1952. Studies in the principles of phytotoxicity. II. Experimental designs and techniques of statistical analysis for the assessment of toxicity. J. Exp. Bot. 3:28–46.Google Scholar
12. Smith, H. F. 1957. Interpretation of adjusted treatment means and regressions in analysis of covariance. Biometrics 13:283–307.Google Scholar
13. Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics–A Biometrical Approach, 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.Google Scholar