Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:00:41.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broadleaf Weed Control in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with Postemergence Directed Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charlotte V. Eberlein,
Mary J. Guttieri and
Felix N. Fletcher
Charlotte V. Eberlein
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Mary J. Guttieri
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Felix N. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to evaluate potato injury and weed control with postemergence-directed (PDIR) bromoxynil, glufosinate, or monocarbamide dihydrogen sulfate (MCDS). All three herbicides controlled hairy nightshade, common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and kochia ≥ 85%, depending on rate, with either mid- or late-PDIR treatment. Bromoxynil or MCDS caused 5 to 6% more initial injury with mid- than with late-PDIR treatment, but total yield and yield of U.S. #1 tubers were not reduced by either herbicide. PDIR glufosinate caused moderate injury at 0.84 kg ha−1, the rate needed for acceptable (≥ 85%) weed control. Total yield was reduced 10% and U.S. #1 yield was reduced 30% by PDIR glufosinate at 0.84 kg ha−1. Thus bromoxynil and MCDS showed potential for use as PDIR treatments in potatoes, but glufosinate did not.

Keywords

Bromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrileglufosinate, 2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl)butanoic acidcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALhairy nightshade, Solanum sarrachoides Sendtner # SOLSAkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. # KCHSCredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREpotato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’Bromoxynilglufosinatemonocarbamide dihydrogen sulfateAmaranthus retroflexusChenopodium albumKochia scopariaSolanum sarrachoidesAMARECHEALKCHSCSOLSA

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1993, pp. 298 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, W. P. 1983. Herbicide-plant selectivity. p. 575–618 in Weed Science: Principles. West Publishing Co., St. Paul.Google Scholar
2. Callihan, R. H. 1989. Cultural and chemical practices for commercial potato weed control. Univ. Idaho Ext. Bull. No. 695.Google Scholar
3. Fawcett, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1988. Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) control in corn (Zea mays) with postemergence-directed herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Haderlie, L. C. and Poulson, M. 1991. 1990 Weed Control Survey. Proc. Univ. of Idaho Winter Commodity Schools. 23:149–154.Google Scholar
5. Kleppe, C. D. and Harvey, R. G. 1989. Tolerance of corn (Zea mays) to sethoxydim applied with precision postemergence directed sprayer equipment. Weed Technol. 3:663–667.Google Scholar
6. Kleppe, C. D. and Harvey, R. G. 1991. Postemergence directed herbicides control wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:746–752.Google Scholar
7. Mersey, B. G., Hall, J. C., Anderson, D. M., and Swanton, C. J. 1990. Factors affecting the herbicidal activity of glufosinate-ammonium: Absorption, translocation, and metabolism in barley and green foxtail. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:90–98.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, R. G. Jr. and Burnside, O. C. 1973. Weed control in soybeans with postemergence-directed herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:81–85.Google Scholar
9. Worthing, C. R. 1991. The Pesticide Manual, 9th edition. British Crop Protection Council, Surrey. p. 458.Google Scholar