No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Developing National Research Teams: A Case Study with the Jointed Goatgrass Research Program
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
Weed scientists are facing research problems, such as invasive weeds, that may require multidisciplinary approaches to solve. One example is jointed goatgrass, a winter annual grass invading winter wheat fields and not easily managed with conventional control tactics. A national research program was started in 1994 to develop jointed goatgrass management strategies. Involving more than 35 scientists with diverse scientific expertise, this national approach fostered cooperative research projects across 11 states. Research involved entomology, economics, plant breeding, plant physiology, genetics, and weed science, leading to successful management systems for jointed goatgrass. To help other scientists organize regional or national programs, we describe development and performance of the jointed goatgrass program as well as suggest ideas for possible improvement. Pivotal to the success of the program was a Steering Committee, whose role was to establish research priorities and coordinate research across the western United States.
Keywords
Jointed goatgrass, Aegilops cylindrica Host. #3 AEGCYwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.AEGCYCongressional special grantintegrated managementstrategic planningtechnology transferBMP, best management practicesCSREES, Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension ServiceWSWS, Western Society of Weed Science.
Information
- Type
- Education/Extension
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Weed Science Society of America
References
Literature Cited
Anderson, G. L., Delfosse, E. S., Spencer, N. R., Prosser, C. W., and Richard, R. D.
2003. Lessons in developing successful invasive weed control programs. J. Range Manage
56:2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R., Zakarison, E., Ball, D., Lyon, D., Donald, W., Miller, S., Young, F., and White, T.
2002. Jointed Goatgrass: Ecology. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Cooperative Extension Bull. EB1932.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L.
1997. Cultural systems can reduce reproductive potential of winter annual grasses. Weed Technol.
11:608–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, D. A., Young, F. L., and Ogg, A. G. Jr.
1999. Selective control of joined goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) with imazamox in herbicide-resistant wheat. Weed Technol.
13:77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugovish, O., Lyon, D. J., and Baltensperger, D. D.
1999. Cropping systems to control winter annual grasses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol.
13:120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Ogg, A. G. Jr.
1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), a review. Weed Technol.
5:3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Zimdahl, R. L.
1987. Persistence, germinability, and distribution of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) seed in soil. Weed Sci.
35:149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. O., Ball, D. A., and Wicks, G. A.
2001. Contrasting jointed goatgrass emergence patterns under uniform fallow-tillage across the Western United States. in Proceeding of Western Society of Weed Science. Newark, CA: WSWS. Pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
Hanavan, D., White, T., Zakarison, E., and Anderson, R.
2002. Jointed Goatgrass—Introduction. Washington State University Extension Bull. EB 1931. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Publishing Department.Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Maxwell, B. D., and Anderson, R. L. et al. 1999. Site-to-site and year-to-year variation in Triticum aestivum–Aegilops cylindrica interference relationships. Weed Sci.
47:529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Maxwell, B. D., and Anderson, R. L. et al. 2001. Evaluation of models predicting winter wheat yield as a function of winter wheat and jointed goatgrass densities. Weed Sci.
49:48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappler, B. F., Lyon, D. J., Stahlman, P. W., Miller, S. D., and Eskridge, K. M.
2002. Wheat plant density influences jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) competitiveness. Weed Technol.
16:102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesbah, A. O. and Miller, S. D.
1999. Fertilizer placement affects jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) competition in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol.
13:374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhouse, K. E., Smith, W. A., Starrett, M. A., Schaefer, T. J., and Singh, B. K.
1992. Tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides in wheat. Plant Physiol
100:882–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogg, A. G. Jr.
1993. Jointed goatgrass survey-1993. Magnitude and scope of the problem. in
Westra, P. and Anderson, R., eds. Proceedings, Jointed Goatgrass Symposium, Denver, CO. Englewood CO: Jointed Goatgrass Initiative. Pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Seefeldt, S. S.
1999. Characterizing traits that enhance the competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci.
47:74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Zemetra, R. S., Young, F. L., and Jones, S. S.
1998. Production of herbicide-resistant jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) × wheat (Triticum aestivum) hybrids in the field by natural hybridization. Weed Sci.
46:632–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, R. S., Bangsund, D. A., and Leistritz, F. L.
1999.
Euphorbia esula: perceptions by ranchers and land managers. Weed Sci.
47:740–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L.
2001. Weeds of Range and Forest: Knapweed Symposium. in Proceeding of Western Society of Weed Science. Newark, CA: WSWS. 95 p.Google Scholar
Zemetra, R. S., Hansen, J., and Mallory-Smith, C. A.
1998. Potential for gene transfer between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci.
46:313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by