Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T06:32:40.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Ammonium Sulfate and Bentazon on Sethoxydim Absorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan,
Alan C. York and
Frederick T. Corbin
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695–7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695–7620
Frederick T. Corbin
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695–7620
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of ammonium sulfate on absorption of 14C-sethoxydim applied alone and with bentazon was studied in large crabgrass. Adding ammonium sulfate to 14C-sethoxydim increased 14C absorption 6-fold at 0.5 h after application but did not affect the amount of 14C absorbed 1 or 4 h after application. Applying bentazon with 14C-sethoxydim reduced 14C absorption 26%. When 14C-sethoxydim was applied with bentazon and ammonium sulfate, 14C absorption and translocation were similar to those with 14C-sethoxydim alone.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidesethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio) propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-oneammonium sulfate, (NH4)2SO4large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.)Scop. ♯3 DIGSAAntagonismherbicide interactionspray adjuvantsDigitaria sanguinalisDIGSA

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 1989, pp. 674 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Campbell, J. R., and Penner, D. 1985. Abiotic transformations of sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 33:435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Carlson, D., Zorner, P., Evans, R., Gourd, D., and Hazen, J. 1989. The influence of DASH adjuvant on the efficacy of sethoxydim. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 29:23.Google Scholar
3. Carter, C. H., and Keeley, P. E. 1987. Selective control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with foliar herbicides. Weed Sci. 35:418–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chow, P.N.P., and MacGregor, A. W. 1983. Effect of ammonium sulfate and surfactants on activity of the herbicide sethoxydim. J. Pestic. Sci. 8:519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gerwick, B. C., III. 1988. Potential mechanisms for bentazon antagonism with haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 36:286–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Grichar, W. J., and Boswell, T. E. 1986. Postemergence grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 34:587–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jordan, D. L., and York, A. C. 1989. Effects of ammonium fertilizers and BCH 81508 S on antagonism with sethoxydim plus bentazon mixtures. Weed Technol. 3:450–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Parker, W. B., Thompson, L. Jr., and Godley, F. M. 1985. Integrating sethoxydim into soybean (Glycine max) weed management systems. Weed Sci. 33:100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Poovaiah, B. W., and Leopold, A. C. 1974. Hormone-solute interactions in the lettuce hypocotyl hook. Plant Physiol. 54:289–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Price, C. E. 1982. A review of the factors influencing the penetration of pesticides through plant leaves. Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. 1:237–252.Google Scholar
11. Rhodes, G. N. Jr., and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Rhodes, G. N. Jr., and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass (Eleusine indica). Weed Sci. 32:595–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics – A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
14. Turner, D. J., and Loader, M.P.L. 1980. Effect of ammonium sulphate and other additives upon the phytotoxicity of glyphosate to Agropyron repens (L.)Beauv. Weed Res. 20:139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Turner, D. J., and Loader, M.P.L. 1984. Effect of ammonium sulphate and related salts on the phytotoxicity of dichlorprop and other herbicides used for broadleafed weed control in cereals. Weed Res. 24:64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Wanamarta, G., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1987. The influence of alkali and alkaline earth cations on the activity of sethoxydim. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 27:68.Google Scholar
17. Wurtman, R. J. 1975. Effects of light on the human body. Sci. Am. 233(1):68–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. York, A. C., and Jordan, D. L. 1988. Effect of nitrogen and Dash on the efficacy of sethoxydim. p. 386–387 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod.–Res. Conf., New Orleans, LA, Jan. 3–8, 1988. Nat. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
19. Zorner, P., Hazen, J., Evans, R., Gourd, D., and Fitzgerald, T. 1989. The influence of DASH adjuvant in limiting photodegradation of sethoxydim on leaf surfaces. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 29:83.Google Scholar