Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:45:39.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quinclorac for Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Control in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lora M. Franetovich and
Thomas F. Peeper
Lora M. Franetovich
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thirteen field experiments were conducted to evaluate quinclorac for cheat control in hard red winter wheat. Cheat control with quinclorac was variable. Quinclorac at 560 and 1120 g a.i./ha applied to tillered wheat controlled cheat 93 to 100% at four sites. In contrast, pooled over four other experiments and four application times, quinclorac at 420 g/ha and 560 g/ha controlled cheat only 20 and 31%, respectively. Quinclorac at 420 g/ha plus chlorsulfuron:metsulfuron (5:1) at 35 g a.i./ha applied PRE increased wheat yield 28% at one of three sites. At two of these sites, averaged over chlorsulfuron:metsulfuron rates of 0, 18, and 35 g a.i./ha, quinclorac at 280 and 420 g/ha applied POST, increased wheat yield 32 to 112%. In two cultivar tolerance experiments, quinclorac treatments did not damage any cultivar. Pooled over cultivars, yields were increased 7 and 10% when quinclorac at 280 and 560 kg/ha was applied, respectively. In a greenhouse experiment, quinclorac plus dicamba or esfenvalerate consistently reduced the leaf area of cheat in a manner suggesting synergistic effects. Of eight adjuvants evaluated in a laboratory experiment, only quinclorac plus the adjuvant BCH 864 01S reduced cheat leaf area more than quinclorac alone.

Keywords

BCH 864 01S, chemistry not availablechlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamidedicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidesfenvalerate, (S)-cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl(S)-4-chloroalpha-(1-methylethyl)benzene acetatemetsulfuron, 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidquinclorac, 3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acidcheat, Bromus secalinus L. # BROSEwheat, Triticum aestivum L.SynergismchlorsulfurondicambaesfenvalerateethylmetribuzinMCPAmetribuzinmetsulfuronpicloramBROSE

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1995, pp. 131 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, T. K. and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Differential tolerance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) to cyanazine and triazinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:569–575.Google Scholar
2. Berghaus, R. and Wuerzer, B. 1987. The mode of action of the new experimental herbicide quinclorac (BAS 514 H). Proc. 11th Conf. Asian Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. 1:81–87.Google Scholar
3. Berghaus, R. and Retzlaff, G. 1988. Uptake and translocation of herbicidal quinolinecarboxylic acids in plants. Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Symp. 28:81–86.Google Scholar
4. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
5. Crawford, S. H. 1986. Weeds in agronomic crops—rice. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 39:62–66.Google Scholar
6. Driver, J. E., Peeper, T. F., and Koscelny, J. A. 1993. Cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 7:851–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Eastin, E. F. 1986. Weeds in agronomic crops—rice. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 39:63–68.Google Scholar
8. Justice, G. G., Peeper, T. F., Driver, J. E., and Koscelny, J. A. 1991. Finesse for cheat suppression in Oklahoma wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:113.Google Scholar
9. Kapusta, G. and Kunkel, D. 1986. Grain sorghum new herbicide study. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 43:107.Google Scholar
10. Kashibuchi, S., Rosebrock, H., and Beck, J. 1987. Behaviour of quinclorac in soils, results of bioassays. Proc. 11th Asian Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf., Taipei, Taiwan; Asian Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. (1987) No. 1, 173–178. From Weed Abstr. 39:358 (3114).Google Scholar
11. Lee, P. W., Stearns, S. M., and Powell, W. R. 1988. Metabolic fate of fervalerate in wheat plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 38:897–898.Google Scholar
12. Manthey, F. A., Nalewaja, J. D., and Szelezniak, E. F. 1990. Small grain and grass response to BAS 514 with adjuvants. Weed Technol. 4:366–369.Google Scholar
13. Morishita, D. W. and Diamond, M. L. 1988. Evaluation of BAS 514 for broadleaf weed control in grain sorghum. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Weed Sci. Soc. 294–295.Google Scholar
14. Morrow, L. A. and Stahlman, P. W. 1984. The history and distribution of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in North America. Weed Sci. 32(Suppl. 1):2–6.Google Scholar
15. Nalewaja, J. D. and Peterson, D. E. 1986. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Prog. Rep. 43:92.Google Scholar
16. Nalewaja, J. D. and Peterson, D. E. 1986. Postemergence grass control in wheat. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Prog. Res. Rep. 43:85.Google Scholar
17. Neal, J. C. 1990. Non-phenoxy herbicides for perennial broadleaf weed control in cool-season turf Weed Technol. 4:555–559.Google Scholar
18. Peeper, T. F. 1984. Chemical and biological control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in wheat and alfalfa in North America. Weed Sci. 32(Suppl. 1): 18–25.Google Scholar
19. Ratliff, R. L., Carver, B. F., and Peeper, T. F. 1991. Expression of metribuzin sensitivity in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) populations. Weed Sci. 39:130–133.Google Scholar
20. Ratliff, R. L. and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Bromus control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with the ethylthio analog of metribuzin. Weed Technol. 4:235–241.Google Scholar
21. Smith, R. J. Jr. and Khodayari, K. 1986. Weeds in agronomic crops—rice. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 39:61.Google Scholar
22. Stovicek, R. F. and Penner, D. 1986. Absorption of BAS 514. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:94–95.Google Scholar
23. Thompson, C. R. and Thill, D. C. 1992. BAS 514 34 H tank mixes to control broadleaf weeds in spring wheat. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 146–147.Google Scholar
24. Thompson, C. R. and Thill, D. C. 1992. BAS 514 H tank mixed with wild oat herbicides for weed control in soft white spring wheat. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 148–149.Google Scholar
25. Van Der Puy, D. L. 1986. Evaluation of preplant incorporated, preemergence and postemergence herbicides for corn. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 43:202.Google Scholar
26. Weed Science Society of America. 1989. Herbicide Handbook, 6th Ed. WSSA, Champaign, IL. p. 22–23.Google Scholar