Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:54:09.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reducing Herbicide Inputs When Establishing No-till Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Carroll M. Moseley and
Edward S. Hagood Jr.
Carroll M. Moseley
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Edward S. Hagood Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In full-season soybean experiments, adding glyphosate, paraquat, or HOE-0661 to chlorimuron, chlorimuron plus linuron, chlorimuron plus metribuzin, or imazaquin was required for effective weed control, especially eastern black nightshade. In double-crop soybean experiments, chlorimuron plus linuron provided similar weed control and yields with or without either glyphosate, paraquat, or HOE-0661. In both full-season and double-crop soybeans, metolachlor combined with chlorimuron mixtures did not enhance weed control or increase yield. These studies indicate a potential for reducing the use of nonselective herbicides or metolachlor when chlorimuron or imazaquin are components of tank mixes, particularly in double-crop no-till soybeans.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]-amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineHOE-0661, ammonium (3-amino-3-carboxypropyl)-methylphosphinateimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidlinuron, N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylureametolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidemetribuzin, [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one]paraquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ioneastern black nightshade, Solanum ptycanthum Dun. ♯3 SOLPTsoybean, Glycine max (L.)Merr. ‘Essex’ and ‘York’ChlorimuronglyphosateHOE-0661imazaquinlinuronmetolachlormetribuzinparaquat

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1990, pp. 14 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Beste, C. E. (Chairman Herbicide Handbook Committee). 1983. Herbicide Handbook, Fifth Edition. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
2. Claus, J. S. 1987. Chlorimuron-ethyl (Classic)®: A new broadleaf postemergence herbicide in soybeans. Weed Technol. 1:114–115.Google Scholar
3. Congleton, W. F., Vancantfort, A. M., and Lignowski, E. M. 1987. Imazaquin (Scepter)®: A new soybean herbicide. Weed Technol. 1:186–188.Google Scholar
4. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference. 1987. Canopy®. p. 390. 3rd ed. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Pub. Co., New York.Google Scholar
5. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference. 1987. Gemini®. p. 421. 3rd ed. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Pub. Co., New York.Google Scholar
6. Davis, P. H., and Hagood, E. S. 1986. Evaluation of herbicides for no-till corn establishment. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:24.Google Scholar
7. Dunn, J. C., VanWinkle, D., and Lignowski, E. M. 1985. Imazaquin weed control in no-till double crop soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:81.Google Scholar
8. Grande, J. A., Harrison, S. A., and Beardmore, R. A. 1987. Weed response to HOE-0661 in no-till soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:48.Google Scholar
9. Hadley, B. A., and Davis, C. P. 1986. DPX-F6025 – field evaluations for postemergence weed control in soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:15.Google Scholar
10. Hagood, E. S., and Davis, P. H. 1986. Horseweed control in no-till corn and soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:26.Google Scholar
11. Hines, T. E., and Wilson, H. P. 1987. Italian ryegrass control in no-till corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:68.Google Scholar
12. Nandihalli, U. B., and Bendixen, L. E. 1988. Absorption, translocation, and toxicity of foliar-applied imazaquin in yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus). Weed Sci. 36:313–317.Google Scholar
13. Reddy, K. N., and Bendixen, L. E. 1988. Toxicity, absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar applied chlorimuron in yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus). Weed Sci. 36:707–712.Google Scholar
14. Ritter, R. L., and Kaufman, L. M. 1989. The utility of HOE-039866 in no-till soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:2.Google Scholar
15. Shelby, P. W., and Hayes, R. M. 1988. Preplant horseweed control for no-till cotton and soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:294.Google Scholar
16. Webb, F. J., Ritter, R. L., Hagood, E. S., Wilson, H. P., and Foy, C. L. 1986. Chemical weed control in field crops. Pest Control Recommendations for Field Crops. Va. Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. No. 237.Google Scholar
17. Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1987. Cinmethylin activity in soybeans. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 41:41.Google Scholar
18. Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33:531–536.Google Scholar