Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:27:23.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residue Management Tactics for Corn Following Spring Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Randy L. Anderson*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, 2923 Medary Avenue, Brookings, SD 57006
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: randy.anderson@ars.usda.gov

Abstract

Producers are interested in tactics for managing crop residues when growing corn after spring wheat. We compared five systems of managing spring wheat residues: conventional tillage, no-till, strip-till, cover crop (hairy vetch) with no-till, and cover crop with strip-till following spring wheat. Conventional tillage consisted of chisel plowing and disking, whereas strip-till consisted of tilling a 15-cm band centered on corn rows, which were spaced 76 cm apart. Plots were split into weed-free and weed-infested subplots. Grain yield in weed-free conditions did not differ among treatments. However, weed-free yield was nearly 40% greater than weed-infested corn in conventional tillage. In contrast, weeds reduced yield only 15% with strip-till. Weed density and biomass was twofold greater with conventional tillage compared with the no-till and strip-till treatments. Weed seedlings also emerged earlier with conventional tillage. Increased weed tolerance with strip-till may be related to fertilizer placement. Corn growth and tolerance to weeds in no-till systems may be improved if a starter fertilizer is placed in the seed furrow.

Information

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable