Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:50:04.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil pH Effect on Imazaquin Persistence in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Brian H. Marsh and
Randy W. Lloyd
Brian H. Marsh
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501
Randy W. Lloyd
Affiliation:
American Cyanamid, Overland Park, KS 66223
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to determine the effect of soil pH ranging from 5.1 to 7.1 on imazaquin persistence on a Grundy silty clay loam (2.8% OM). Imazaquin residues were equivalent at pH 5.5 or higher but persisted longer at pH 5.1. Corn shoot growth was not different at any soil pH. Corn grain yields in 1993 were lower in imazaquin-treated plots than in the check plots at the lowest pH (5.1), where initial imazaquin soil concentrations were between 10 and 13 μg/kg across all pH levels. Corn grain yields were not affected by herbicide carryover in 1994 where soil imazaquin residues were well below critical levels at planting. Yields were lower where soil pH was less than 5.5.

Keywords

Imazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidcorn, Zea mays L.Carryoverherbicide

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1996, pp. 337 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, J.P.E., and Domsch, K. H. 1980. Relationship between herbicide concentration and the rates of enzymatic degradation of 14C-diallate and 14C-triallate in soil. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 9:259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Anderson, J.P.E., 1981. Soil moisture and the rates of biodegradation of diallate and triallate. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13:155–161.Google Scholar
3. Basham, G., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bhalla, P., Hackett, N., Hart, R., and Lignowski, E. 1991. Imazaquin herbicide. p. 237–245 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
5. Brady, N. C., 1974. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 8th ed. McMillan, New York, NY. p. 388–391.Google Scholar
6. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Coleman, N. T., and Thomas, G. W. 1967. The basic chemistry of soil acidity. p. 1–41 in Pearson, R. W. and Adams, F., eds. Soil Acidity and Liming. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
8. Devine, J. M., 1991. Residue analysis. p. 173–178 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
9. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed Sci. 37:712–718.Google Scholar
11. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Loux, M. M., and Reese, K. D. 1992. Effect of soil pH on adsorption and persistence of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 40:490–496.Google Scholar
13. Mangels, G., 1991. Behavior of the imidazolinone herbicides in soil—a review of the literature. p. 191–209 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
14. Marion, G. M., Hendricks, D. M., Dutt, G. R., and Fuller, W. H. 1976. Aluminum and silica solubility in soils. Soil Sci. 121:76–82.Google Scholar
15. Martin, J. H., 1957. Field Crops. p. 663–665 in Soil, The Yearbook of Agriculture. USDA.Google Scholar
16. Ogram, A. V., Jessup, R. E., Ou, L. T., and Rao, P.S.C. 1985. Effects of sorption on biological degradation rates of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid in soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:582–587.Google Scholar
17. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Pennei, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Response of corn (Zea mays) cultivars to imazaquin. Weed Sci. 36:625–628.Google Scholar
19. Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R. E., Matice, J. D., Lavy, T. L., and Frans, R. E. 1986. Residual flumeturon levels in three Arkansas soils under continuous cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) production. Weed Sci. 34:122–130.Google Scholar
20. Sander, K. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Differential tolerance and behavior on selected corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Sci. 37:290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Savage, K. E., 1978. Persistence of several dinitroaniline herbicides as affected by soil moisture. Weed Sci. 26:465–471.Google Scholar
22. SAS Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT users guide. Version 6.03 ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
23. Schroeder, J., and Banks, P. A. 1986. Persistence and activity of norflurazon and fluridone in five Georgia soils under controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 34:599–606.Google Scholar
24. Shaner, D. L., 1991. Physiological effects of the imidazolinone herbicides. p. 129–137 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
25. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wepplo, P. J., 1991. Chemical and physical properties of the imidazolinones. p. 15–29 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar