Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T21:14:11.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Winter Annual Weed Control with Fall-Applied Corn (Zea mays) Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ronald F. Krausz ,
Bryan G. Young  and
Joseph L. Matthews
Ronald F. Krausz*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4415
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4415
Joseph L. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4415
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: rkrausz@siu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during the 2000 to 2001 growing seasons to evaluate winter annual weed control and crop tolerance with fall-applied herbicides in corn at Belleville, IL. Atrazine, simazine, and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron applied in the fall controlled mouseear chickweed, henbit, and Carolina foxtail 93% or greater at planting the following spring. Flumetsulam controlled mouseear chickweed and henbit 98 and 93%, respectively, at planting. Metribuzin controlled mouseear chickweed and henbit 100 and 97%, respectively. CGA-152005 controlled mouseear chickweed, henbit, and wild garlic 93 to 100%. CGA-152005 provided the greatest control of wild garlic, with control ranging from 94 to 100% at planting. CGA-152005 plus simazine controlled 99 to 100% of all winter annual weeds evaluated. Reducing winter annual weed vegetation did not increase soil temperatures at 5-cm depth in May. CGA-152005 caused discoloration and height reduction of corn. CGA-152005 at the highest rate (60 g ai/ha) reduced corn plant height by 7% and grain yield by 8%.

Keywords

AtrazineCGA-152005, 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[[2-(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-phenylsulfonyl]]-ureaflumetsulammetribuzinrimsulfuronsimazinethifensulfuronCarolina foxtail, Alopercurus carolinianus Walt. # ALOCAhenbit, Lamium amplexicaule L. # LAMAMmouseear chickweed, Cerastium vulgatum L. # CERVUwild garlic, Allium vineale L. # ALLVIcorn, Zea mays (L.) ‘Pioneer 33G28 LL’Discolorationheight reductionpreemergenceDAP, days after plantingDAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergence

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 516 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2001. Acreage. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1991. Early preplant atrazine and metolachlor in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:66–71.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. A. and Harvey, R. G. 2000. Glyphosate with and without residual herbicides in no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:569–577.Google Scholar
Dahlke, B. J., Hayden, T. A., Leif, J. W., and Medlin, C. R. 2001. Fall application of imazaquin, plus glyphosate (premix) for winter annual weed control in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:93.Google Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:354–360.Google Scholar
Gueli, R. and Smeda, R. J. 2001. Soybean weed management with fall applied herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:98.Google Scholar
Hasty, R. F., Sprague, C. L., and Hager, A. G. Winter annual weed control with fall and early preplant herbicide applications. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:125.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1997. Acetolactate synthase-resistant and -susceptible corn (Zea mays) response to imazethapyr, imazaquin, chlorimuron, and CGA-152005. Weed Technol. 11:810–816.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 2000. Application timing determines giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:161–166.Google Scholar
Lee, A. T. and Witt, W. W. 2001. Persistence and efficacy of fall-applied simazine and atrazine. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:50.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Hart, S. E. 1997. Preemergence broadleaf weed control and crop tolerance in imidazolinone-resistant and susceptible corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11:118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, R., Harrison, S. K., and Riedel, R. M. 2000. Weed hosts of soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) in Ohio. Weed Technol. 14:156–160.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:478–483.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Bryant, K. J., and Earnest, L. D. 1999. Weed control and economics in nontransgenic and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:586–593.Google Scholar