Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T16:01:53.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between-Row Mowing Systems Control Summer Annual Weeds in No-Till Grain Sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William W. Donald
William W. Donald*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 269 Agricultural Engineering Building, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211
*
Author's E-mail: cny00431@centurytel.net
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In previous research, use of PRE soil residual herbicides was reduced 50% in no-till corn and soybean by banding herbicides over crop rows followed by mowing weeds growing between rows two times. The research goals were (1) to determine whether such between-row mowing systems adequately controlled weeds and prevented grain yield loss in other competitive field crops, such as no-till grain sorghum, and (2) to compare broadcast herbicide treatments with between-row mowing systems. PRE atrazine plus dimethenamid at relative rates of 0.75× and 1× (where 1× = 1.7 plus 1.3 kg ai/ha, respectively) were band-applied over rows shortly after planting followed by two between-row mowings close to the soil surface. In 2 of 3 yr in Missouri, this system controlled giant foxtail and common waterhemp as well as broadcast herbicides in no-till sorghum. In 2 of 3 yr, between-row mowing systems also prevented yield loss in no-till sorghum as well as both broadcast herbicides at the same rates and the weed-free check.

Keywords

Atrazinedimethenamidgiant foxtail, Setaria faberii (L.) Beauv. SETVIcommon waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer. AMATAcorn, Zea mays L. ZEAMXsorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench SORVU ‘Northup King GS10’ and ‘Pioneer 84G62’soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrAlternative weed controlapplicationbandingcuttingmechanical weed controlnonchemical weed controlreduced rate herbicide

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2007, pp. 511 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Baumann, P. A. and Weaver, D. N. 1991. Suggestions for weed control in sorghum. Texas Agricultural Extension Service. 13.Google Scholar
Bishnoi, U. R., Mays, D. A., and Fabasso, M. T. 1990. Response of no-till and conventionally planted grain sorghum to weed control method and row spacing. Plant Soil 129:117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, R. L., Lai, R., Doran, J. W., Langdale, G. W., and Frye, W. W. 1998. Conservation tillage for erosion control and soil quality. Pages 51–68. in Pierce, F.J. and Frye, W.W. eds. Advances in Soil and Water Conservation. Ann Arbor, Michigan Sleeping Bear.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Hartzler, R. G. 2001. Emergence and persistence of seed of velvetleaf, common waterhemp, woolly cupgrass, and giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 49:230–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1969. Influence of weed competition on sorghum growth. Weed Sci. 17:332–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheema, Z. A., Khaliq, A., and Saeed, S. 2004. Weed control in maize (Zea mays L.) through sorghum allelopathy. J. Sust. Agric. 23:73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. 2000a. Between row mowing + in-row band-applied herbicide for weed control in Glycine max . Weed Sci. 48:487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. 2000b. Timing and frequency of between-row mowing and band-applied herbicide for annual weed control in soybean. Agron. J. 92:1013–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W., Kitchen, N. R., and Sudduth, K. A. 2001. Between-row mowing + banded herbicide to control annual weeds and reduce herbicide use in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:576–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaynor, J. D. and Van Wesenbeeck, I. J. 1995. Effects of band widths on atrazine, metribuzin, and metolachlor runoff. Weed Technol. 9:107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, H. M., Hartzler, R. G., and Erbach, D. C. 2000. High-speed cultivation and banding for weed management in no-till corn. Applied Eng. Agric. 16:359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, R. G., Buhler, D. D., and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1999. Emergence characteristics of four annual species. Weed Sci. 47:578–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoshmand, A. R. 1994. Experiment Research Design and Analysis. A Practical Approach for Agricultural and Natural Sciences. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press.Google Scholar
Logan, T. J. 1993. Agricultural best management practices for water pollution control: current issues. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 46:223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulas, J. 1984. Allelopathy of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. on weeds and crops. Acta Agron. Acad. Sci. Hung. 33:423–427.Google Scholar
Missouri Agricultural Statistics Service 2004. Missouri Farm Facts 2004. [Online] Available at http://agebb.missouri.edu/mass/farmfact/crops/ (accessed Aug. 9, 2005).Google Scholar
Nimbal, C. I., Pedersen, J. F., Yerkes, C. N., Weston, L. A., and Weller, S. C. 1986. Phytotoxicity and distribution of sorgoleone in grain sorghum germplasm. in Putnam, A.R. and Tang, C.S., eds. The Science of Allelopathy. New York John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Paarlberg, K. R., Hanna, H. M., Erbach, D. C., and Hartzler, R. G. 1998. Cultivator design for interrow weed control in no-till corn. Applied Eng. Agric. 14:353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W. M. 1969. Dryland sorghum production and weed control with minimum tillage. Weed Sci. 17:451–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. P. and Baker, D. B. 1993. Pesticide concentration patterns in agricultural drainage networks in the Lake Erie Basin. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12:13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rikoon, J. S., Constance, D. H., and Galetta, S. 1996. Factors affecting farmer's use and rejection of banded pesticide applications. J. Soil Water Conserv. 51:322–329.Google Scholar
Rooney, W. L. 2000. Chapter 2.2 Genetics and cytogenetics. Pages 281–282. in Smith, C.W. and Frederiksen, R.A. eds. Sorghum. Origin, History, Technology, and Production. New York John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Santelmann, P. W., Meade, J. A., and Peters, R. A. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail. Weeds 11:139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Wicks, G. A. 2000. Chapter 3.5 Weeds and their control in grain sorghum. Pages 535–590. in Smith, C.W. and Frederiksen, R.A. eds. Sorghum. Origin, History, Technology, and Production. New York John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Unger, P. W. 1999. Conversion of conservation reserve program (CRP) grassland for dryland crops in a semiarid region. Agron. J. 91:753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service 2004. Agricultural chemical usage database. Washington, DC USDA-NASS [Online] Available at http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/app_usage.cfm (accessed June 15, 2005).Google Scholar