Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T17:24:10.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control in Sugarbeet with Clopyralid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Karen A. Renner
Karen A. Renner*
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sugarbeet tolerance to and Canada thistle control from tank mixtures of clopyralid plus other postemergence herbicides and/or petroleum oil adjuvant applied at various times were determined. Herbicides were applied to 5 to 20 or 20 to 70-cm tall Canada thistle. Clopyralid at 0.14 and 0.21 kg ai ha-1 alone or with petroleum oil adjuvant did not injure sugarbeet. Tank mixing clopyralid with desmedipham/phenmedipham plus endothall injured sugarbeet 7 d after application in 2 of 3 yr but not when observed 14 d after application. Herbicides applied early postemergence in 1987 and late postemergence in 1988 controlled Canada thistle poorly due to rainfall 1 h after application and drought conditions, respectively. The addition of petroleum oil adjuvant enhanced control of Canada thistle by clopyralid at 0.14 kg ha-1, and control equaled that of clopyralid at 0.21 kg ha-1 alone. Addition of desmedipham/phenmedipham plus endothall to clopyralid did not reduce Canada thistle control. Petroleum oil adjuvant added to clopyralid at 0.14 kg ha-1 increased Canada thistle control to that achieved by clopyralid at 0.21 kg ha-1 plus desmedipham/phenmedipham plus endothall.

Keywords

Clopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic aciddesmedipham, ethyl [3-[[(phenylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]carbamateendothall, 7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane-2,3-dicarboxylic acidphenmedipham, 3-[(methoxycarbonyl)amino] phenyl (3-methylphenyl)carbamateCanada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. ♯ CIRARsugarbeet, Beta vulgaris L.Crop oil concentrateinteractionspetroleum oil adjuvantphytotoxicityBeta vulgarisCIRAR

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1991, pp. 392 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1988. Phytotoxicity and uptake of clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) as affected by adjuvants and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:143–147.Google Scholar
2. Devine, M. D., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dexter, A. G. 1988. Clopyralid for weed control in sugarbeets. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 43:110.Google Scholar
4. Donald, W. W. 1988. Clopyralid effects on shoot emergence, root biomass, and secondary shoot regrowth potential of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 36:804–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Duke, S. O. 1988. Glyphosate. p. 1–71 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides, Vol. 3, Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Marcel-Dekker, New York. 403 pp.Google Scholar
6 Hodgson, J. M. 1974. Canada thistle. Weeds Today 5(1):10–11.Google Scholar
7. Sharma, M. P., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1981. Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] control in barley and rapeseed after the same crop or other fallow. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 29.Google Scholar
8. Turnbell, G. C., and Stephenson, G. R. 1985. Translocation of clopyralid and 2,4-D in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Whitesides, R. E., and Appleby, A. P. 1979. Dowco 290 herbicide for selective control of Canada thistle in peppermint. Down Earth 35(2):14–18.Google Scholar