Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:52:32.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Lambsquarters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry W. Mitich
Larry W. Mitich*
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot., Univ. Calif., Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Common lambsquarters or fat hen (Chenopodium album L. # CHEAL) was classified by Linneaus in 1753. The generic name is from the Greek chen, a goose, and pous or podos, a foot; the leaf shape of plants in this genus are reminiscent of goose feet. The goosefoot family, Chenopodiaceae, includes many vegetables: table beets, sugar beets, spinach, and mangold. The name ‘fat hen’, used for several plants of the Goosefoot family, was first published in English in 1795.

Information

Type
Intriguing World of Weeds
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 550 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Aamisepp, A. 1976. Weed control in potatoes and sugar beets. Swed. Weed Conf. (SWDCA) 17:D-30, D-32.Google Scholar
2. Abrams, L. 1944. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States. Vol. II. Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
3. Aellen, P. 1929. Beitrag zur systematik du Chenopodium . Rep. Spec. Nov. Regn. Veget. 26(1):31–64. 26(2):119–160.Google Scholar
4. Boche, J., and Runquist, O. 1968. Kinetics of the thermal rearrangement of ascaridole. J. Organ. Chem. 33:4285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gumming, B. G. 1963. The dependence of germination on photo-period, light quality and temperature in Chenopodium spp. Can. J. Bot. 41:1211–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Everist, S. L. 1979. Poisonous Plants of Australia, 2nd ed. Angus & Robertson Publ., London.Google Scholar
7. Fernald, M. L., and Kinsey, A. C. 1951. Edible Wild Plants of Eastern North America. Harper Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
8. Harrington, H. D. 1967. Edible Native Plants of the Rocky Mountains. Univ. N. M. Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
9. Hatfield, A. W. 1969. How to Enjoy Your Weeds. Frederick Muller, London.Google Scholar
10. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Weeds of the World — Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
11. Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Moquin-Tandon, A. 1840. Chenopodearum Monographica Enumeratio. P. J. Loss, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Murray, J.A.H., Bradley, H., Craigie, W. A., and Onions, C. T., eds. 1933. The Oxford English Dictionary. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
14. Plowden, C. C. 1970. A Manual of Plant Names. 2nd ed. Philosophical Library, New York.Google Scholar
15. Prior, R.C.A. 1870. On the Popular Names of British Plants, 2nd ed. Williams and Norgate, London.Google Scholar
16. Stevens, O. A. 1932. The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. Am. J. Bot. 19:784–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wisk, E. L., and Cole, R. H. 1966. Effect of date of application of two pre-plant herbicides on weed control and crop injury in soybeans. Proc. Northeast Weed Conf. 21:366–367.Google Scholar
18. Wodehouse, R. P. 1971. Hay Fever Plants, 2nd ed. Hafner Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar
19. Wright, R. H. 1972. What Good is a Weed? Ecology in Action. Lothrop, Lee & Shepard Co., New York.Google Scholar