Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T14:08:34.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Halosulfuron and 2,4-D Mixtures' Effects on Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark A. Isaacs,
Kriton K. Hatzios,
Henry P. Wilson and
Joe Toler
Mark A. Isaacs
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
Kriton K. Hatzios
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0331
Henry P. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
Joe Toler
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0379
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: hwilson@vt.edu
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate the response of common lambsquarters to POST applications of halosulfuron–methyl plus 2,4-D admixtures and to investigate the effects of 2,4-D on the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of halosulfuron. In the greenhouse, halosulfuron at 0, 4.5, 9, 18, and 36 g ai/ha was applied alone and mixed with 2,4-D at 0, 17, 35, and 70 g ai/ha POST to 7.5- to 9-cm seedlings, and plant fresh weights were determined 4 wk after treatment (WAT). Halosulfuron alone did not control this weed, while fresh weights of common lambsquarters treated with 2,4-D declined hyperbolically as rates increased. A synergistic response for mixtures of these herbicides occurred, as observed fresh weights for all combinations were less than expected based on independent action and the calibrated marginal responses. In the laboratory, 7.5- to 9-cm seedlings were treated POST with commercially formulated halosulfuron at 9 and 18 g/ha and 2,4-D at 0, 70, and 140 g/ha, respectively, followed by foliar-applied 14C-halosulfuron. Absorption of 14C-halosulfuron increased with time, and absorption and translocation were not influenced by the addition of 2,4-D. Results from these studies inferred that halosulfuron and 2,4-D were generally synergistic on common lambsquarters and that mechanisms other than absorption, translocation, and metabolism may explain this response.

Keywords

2,4-Dhalosulfuroncommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEALAbsorptionsynergismtranslocationmetabolismherbicide mixturesacetolactate synthaseALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18)CDE, combined dosage equivalencyHAT, hours after treatmentLSS, liquid scintillation spectroscopyNIS, nonionic surfactantTLC, thin-layer chromatography

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2006, pp. 137 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America: Pp. 207–209.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1994. Permit® Herbicide Product Label. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto Co. Agricultural Products.Google Scholar
Burrows, P. M. 1987. Interaction concepts for analyses of responses to mixtures of nematode populations. in Veech, J. A. and Dickson, D. W., eds. Vistas on Nematology. Hyattsville, MD: Society of Nematologists. Pp. 82–93.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365–374.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D., Bestman, H. D., and Vandenborn, W. H. 1990. Physiological basis for the different phloem mobilities of chlorsulfuron and clopyralid. Weed Sci. 38:1–9.Google Scholar
Diehl, K. E., Stoller, E. W., and Barrett, M. 1995. In vivo and in vitro inhibition of nicosulfuron metabolism by terbufos metabolites in maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 51:137–149.Google Scholar
Dubelman, A. M., Solsten, T. R., Fujiwara, H., and Mehrsheikh, A. 1997. Metabolism of halosulfuron by corn and wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45:2314–2321.Google Scholar
Fonne-Pfister, R., Gaudin, J., Kreuz, K., Ramsteiner, K., and Ebert, E. 1990. Hydroxylation of primisulfuron by an inducible cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase system from maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallaher, K., Mueller, T. C., Hayes, R. M., Schwartz, O., and Barrett, M. 1999. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of primisulfuron and nicosulfuron in broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla) and corn. Weed Sci. 47:8–12.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Bailey, S. P. 1987. Herbicide interactions with herbicides and other agricultural chemicals. in McWhorter, C. G. and Gebhardt, M. R., eds. Methods of Applying Herbicides. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 37–61.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. 1990. Synergizing herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 5:49–82.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E. 1997. Interacting effects of MON 12000 and CGA-152005 with other herbicides in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 45:434–438.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E. and Maxwell, D. J. 1995. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in corn. Dekalb, IL. Research report. N. Centr. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:128–129.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. East-West Center Book. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. Pp. 84–91.Google Scholar
Isaacs, M. A., Wilson, H. P., and Toler, J. E. 2002. Rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron-methyl combinations with selected postemergence broadleaf herbicides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:664–668.Google Scholar
Isaacs, M. A., Wilson, H. P., and Toler, J. E. 2003. Combinations of sethoxydim with postemergence broadleaf herbicides in sethoxydim-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 17:224–228.Google Scholar
Kalnay, P. A., Glen, S., and Phillips, W. H. II. 1995. Hemp dogbane and lambsquarters control in no-till corn with MON 12037 tank mixtures. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:38.Google Scholar
Kleier, D. A. 1988. Phloem mobility of xenobiotics. I. Mathematical model unifying the weak acid and intermediate permeability theories. Plant Physiol. 86:803–810.Google Scholar
Koeppe, M. K. and Brown, H. M. 1995. Sulfonylurea herbicide plant metabolism and crop selectivity. Agro-Food-Ind. Hi-Tech. 6:9–14.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, G. L. and Rusness, D. G. 1986. Xenobiotic conjugation in higher plants. in Paulson, G. D., Caldwell, J., Hutson, D. H., and Menn, J. J., eds. Xenobiotic Conjugation Chemistry. ACS Symposium Series 299. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. Pp. 62–105.Google Scholar
Manley, B. S., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1998. Characterization of imidazolinone-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus). Weed Technol. 4:575–584.Google Scholar
Morse, P. M. 1978. Some comments on the assessment of joint action in herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci. 26:58–71.Google Scholar
Ohmes, G. A. Jr. and Kendig, J. A. 1999. Inheritance of an ALS-cross-resistant common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) biotype. Weed Technol. 13:100–103.Google Scholar
Parks, R. J., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., Hartwig, N. L., and Calvin, D. D. 1995. Common lambsquarters (Common lambsquarters) control in corn with postemergence herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technol. 9:728–735.Google Scholar
Schloss, J. V. 1990. Acetolactate synthase: mechanism of action and its herbicide binding site. Pestic. Sci. 29:283–292.Google Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46:652–660.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied chlorimuron in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:175–180.Google Scholar