Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T10:57:35.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selective Weed Control with Glyphosate in Glyphosate-Resistant Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw and
K. Neil Harker
Robert E. Blackshaw*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge AB, Canada
K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe AB, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: blackshaw@em.agr.ca
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant spring wheat is being developed and may soon be available to growers. Field experiments were conducted to examine the effect of various rates and application timings of glyphosate on the tolerance of glyphosate-resistant spring wheat and the level of weed control attained with glyphosate in wheat. Glyphosate-resistant wheat exhibited excellent tolerance to glyphosate applied at the one- to two- or four- to five-leaf stages at rates up to 1,780 g ae/ha, representing a fourfold safety margin to the proposed field use rate. Glyphosate at 445 g/ha reduced shoot biomass of green foxtail, wild oat, redroot pigweed, and wild mustard > 95% in glyphosate-resistant wheat in all years, but wild buckwheat biomass was only reduced 67 to 75% at doses up to 890 g/ha. Glyphosate applied in-crop at 667 g/ha reduced quackgrass biomass by 97 to 99%. Comparison of glyphosate with other spring wheat herbicides indicated that glyphosate provided similar or better in-crop control of several weed species. Yield of weed-infested glyphosate-resistant spring wheat responded positively to glyphosate in all years.

Keywords

Glyphosategreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. #3 SETVIquackgrass, Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski # AGRREredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREwild buckwheat, Polygonum convolvulus L. # POLCOwild mustard, Brassica kaber (DC.) L.C. Wheeler # SINARwild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAspring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Bobwhite’, ‘BW251’Herbicide resistancewheat tolerancewheat yield

Information

Type
Commentary
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2002, pp. 885 - 892
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2001. Crop Protection. Agdex 606-1. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural development. pp. 46–332.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 13: 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Hall, L. M., and Tardif, F. J. 2001. Herbicide resistance in Canada—Where are we today? In Blackshaw, R. E. and Hall, L. M., eds. Integrated Weed Management: Explore the Potential. Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada: Expert Committee on Weeds. pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., Legere, A. L., Kelner, D. J., Van Acker, R. C., and Meers, S. 1999. Nature, occurrence, and cost of herbicide-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) in small-grain production areas. Weed Technol. 13: 612–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1996. Growth stage and broadleaf herbicide effects on CGA184927 efficacy. Weed Technol. 10: 732–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, D. C. 1994. Impact of weeds on human endeavors. Weed Technol. 8: 392–395.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1992. Rationale for developing herbicide resistant crops. Weed Technol. 6: 621–625.Google Scholar
Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K. eds. 1991. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann. 513 p.Google Scholar
Eue, L. 1986. World challenges in weed science. Weed Sci. 34: 155–160.Google Scholar
Faircloth, W. H., Patterson, M. G., Monks, C. D., and Goodman, W. R. 2001. Weed management programs for glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 15: 544–551.Google Scholar
Hall, L., Topinka, K., Huffman, J., Davis, L., and Good, A. 2000. Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers. Weed Sci. 48: 688–694.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and Blackshaw, R. E. 1991. Influence of growth stage and broadleaf herbicides on tralkoxydim activity. Weed Sci. 39: 650–659.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E., Kirkland, K. J., Derksen, D. A., and Wall, D. 2000. Herbicide-tolerant canola: weed control and yield comparisons in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80: 647–654.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. and Morrison, I. N. 1996. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 44: 25–30.Google Scholar
Holm, F. A., Kirkland, K. J., and Stevenson, F. C. 2000. Defining optimum herbicide rates and timing for wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 14: 167–175.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Bradley, P. R., Hart, S. E., Buesinger, M. L., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14: 57–65.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. J., Johnson, E. N., and Stevenson, F. C. 2001. Control of wild oat (Avena fatua) in wheat with MKH 6562. Weed Technol. 15: 48–55.Google Scholar
Lee, L. J. and Ngim, J. 2000. A first report of glyphosate-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn) in Malaysia. Pestic. Manag. Sci. 56: 336–339.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 1999. Weed management in wide- and narrow-row glyphosate resistant soybean. J. Prod. Agric. 12: 460–465.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Dellow, J. J., and Preston, C. 1998. Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia. Weed Sci. 46: 604–607.Google Scholar
Pratley, J., Urwin, N., Stanton, R., Baines, P., Broster, J., Cullis, K., Schafer, D., Bohn, J., and Krueger, R. 1999. Resistance to glyphosate in Lolium rigidum. I. Bioevaluation. Weed Sci. 47: 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, T. A. and Thill, D. C. 2001. Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Spring Wheat. Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Report. p. 140.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Vol. 2, 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 846 p.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book. 633 p.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Harker, K. N., and Anderson, R. L. 1993. Crop losses due to weeds in Canada. Weed Technol. 7: 537–542.Google Scholar
Tharp, B. E. and Kells, J. J. 1999. Influence of herbicide application rate, timing, and interrow cultivation on weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield in glufosinate-resistant and glyphosate- resistant corn. Weed Technol. 13: 807–813.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci. 49: 703–705.Google Scholar
Webster, E. R., Bryant, K. J., and Earnest, L. D. 1999. Weed control and economics in nontransgenic and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Toker, J. D., and Scheenstra, E. J. 2001. Wild Oat Control in Roundup-Ready Spring Wheat. Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Report. p. 148.Google Scholar