Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:18:05.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short-Term Split Application Effects of Grass-Specific Herbicides on Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Under Field Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. Neil Harker
K. Neil Harker*
Affiliation:
Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Research Centre, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada T4L 1W1
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Lacombe Research Station from 1989 to 1991 to determine if short-term, split applications of grass-specific herbicides would improve quackgrass control relative to single applications. Quackgrass infested plots were planted to canola the first year and barley the following year. Glyphosate applied at 880 g/ha controlled quackgrass to a greater extent and for a longer time period than any of the grass-specific herbicides. In contrast to glyphosate, none of the grass-specific herbicides controlled quackgrass 1 yr after treatment. Quackgrass control with sethoxydim or fluazifop-P was usually similar when applied as single or short-term, split applications. In contrast, quizalofop often provided better quackgrass control and higher crop yields when short-term, split applications were compared to a single application with the same total amount of quizalofop. However, the extent of increased quackgrass control is difficult to justify due to increased application costs and inconvenience.

Keywords

Fluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]-propanoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinequizalofop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1(ethoxyimino)-butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onequackgrass, Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski # AGRREbarley, Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Leduc’canola, Brassica rapa L. ‘Tobin.’Fluazifop-PglyphosatequizalofopsethoxydimAgropyron repensAGRRE

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1995, pp. 710 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Tripp, T. N. 1983. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in soybeans (Glycine max) with foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 31:628–633.Google Scholar
2. Cammack, M. W. 1982. PP009, a new selective systemic herbicide for control of grasses in broadleaf crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:390.Google Scholar
3. Claus, J. S. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149–152.Google Scholar
4. Daniell, J. W. 1982. Effect of PP009, BAS-9052, MBR-18337, and glyphosate (Roundup) on grass control in peaches. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:137.Google Scholar
5. Dekker, J. H. and Chandler, K. 1985. Herbicide effect on the viability of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) rhizome buds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:1057–1064.Google Scholar
6. Gabor, W. E. and Veatch, C. 1981. Isolation of a phytotoxin from quackgrass (Agropyron repens) rhizomes. Weed Sci. 29:155–159.Google Scholar
7. Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Effects of phenology on translocation patterns of several herbicides in quackgrass, Agropyron repens . Weed Sci. 36:463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harker, K. N. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1993. Herbicide comparisons on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) within different crop competition and tillage conditions. Weed Sci. 41:94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Harker, K. N and Taylor, J. S. 1994. Chlormequat chloride (CCC) pretreatments may enhance quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control with sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 8:499–507.Google Scholar
10. Hicks, C. P. and Jordan, T. N. 1984. Response of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), quackgrass (Agropyron repens), and wirestem muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) to postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:835–841.Google Scholar
11. Johnson, B. G. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1962. The natural dormancy of vegetative buds on the rhizomes of quackgrass. Weeds 10:53–57.Google Scholar
12. Kells, J. J., Meggit, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:142–149.Google Scholar
13. McIntyre, G. I. 1971. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. Some factors affecting the degree of dominance in isolated rhizomes. Can. J. Bot. 49:99–109.Google Scholar
14. Noveroske, R. L., Keeney, F. N., and Brown, J. G. 1992. The characterization of uptake and transport with a radiolabeled aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicide as influenced by adjuvants. p. 149–157 in Foy, C. L. ed., Adjuvants for Agrichemicals, Proc. 2nd Intl. Symp. on Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
15. Robertson, J. M., Taylor, J. S., Harker, K. N., Pocock, R. N., and Yeung, E. 1989. Apical dominance in the rhizome of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens): Inhibitory effect of the scale leaves. Weed Sci. 37:680–687.Google Scholar
16. Rogan, P. G. and Smith, D. L. 1976. Experimental control of bud inhibition in rhizomes of Agropyron repens L. Beauv. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. 78:113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Stoltenberg, D. E. and Wyse, D. L. 1986. Regrowth of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) following postemergence applications of haloxyfop and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:664–668.Google Scholar
18. Waldecker, M. A. and Wyse, D. L. 1984. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with BAS 9052 OH, KK-80, and Ro-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:67–75.Google Scholar
19. Yenish, J. P. and Doll, J. D. 1990. Efficacy of CGA-136872, DPX-V9360, and DPX-79406 on quackgrass (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.) control in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 5.Google Scholar