Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T11:06:08.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Viability of Seeds in Feed Pellets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Zamora and
James P. Olivarez
David L. Zamora
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
James P. Olivarez
Affiliation:
U.S.F.S., P.O. Box 7669, Missoula, MT 59807
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed response to grinding in a hammer mill or extrusion through a pellet die was determined. Less than 1% of spotted knapweed, sulfur cinquefoil, timothy, and alfalfa seeds were intact after grinding to pass through a 1-mm screen. Intact seeds of all tested species except sulfur cinquefoil were able to germinate after grinding. Extruding unground alfalfa seed through a die to make hay pellets decreased viability 60 to 63%. After grinding and extrusion through a grain pellet die, 53% of intact alfalfa seeds in the pellets were viable. These data demonstrate that feed pellets can contain viable weed seeds.

Keywords

Spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam. # CENMAsulfur cinquefoil, Potentilla recta L. # PTLRCalfalfa, Medicago sativa L. ‘Ranchers Blend’ and ‘Ranger’ # MEDSAtimothy, Phleum pratense L. # PHLPRGerminationhard weedweedsCENMAMEDSAPHLPRPTLRC

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1994, pp. 148 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1992. Noxious Weed Trust Fund Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Montana Department of Agriculture, Agricultural and Biological Sciences Division, Helena, MT. 171 p.Google Scholar
2. Dewey, S. A., Thill, D. C., and Foote, P. W. 1985. Weed seed contamination of cereal grain seedlots—a drillbox survey. CIS No. 767, Univ. of Idaho, Extension Service/Agricultural Experiment Station. 2 p.Google Scholar
3. Official Association of Seed Analysts. 1993. Rules for testing seed. J. Seed Technol. 16:1–113.Google Scholar
4. Pfost, H. B. 1970. Grinding and rolling. P. 68–77 in Pfost, H. B., ed. Feed Manufacturing Technology. Feed Production Council, American Feed Manufacturing Association, Inc. Google Scholar
5. Robinson, R. A. 1970. Pelleting—introduction and general definitions. P. 96–103 in Pfost, H. B., ed. Feed Manufacturing Technology. Feed Production Council, American Feed Manufacturing Association, Inc. Google Scholar
6. Robinson, R. A. 1990. Pelleting—the uses expand. For. Prod. J. 40:21–24.Google Scholar