Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T16:28:25.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control with CGA-152005 and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. James Grichar,
David C. Sestak,
Kevin Brewer and
Brad Minton
W. James Grichar*
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995; Research Scientist II, Novartis Crop Protection, Cypress, TX 77429
David C. Sestak
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995; Research Scientist II, Novartis Crop Protection, Cypress, TX 77429
Kevin Brewer
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995; Research Scientist II, Novartis Crop Protection, Cypress, TX 77429
Brad Minton
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995; Research Scientist II, Novartis Crop Protection, Cypress, TX 77429
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: taes@viptx.net.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1994 and 1995 to evaluate CGA-152005 for weed control and effect on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield in Texas peanut production areas. CGA-152005 at 10 to 20 g/ha controlled eclipta (Eclipta prostrata), golden crownbeard (Verbesina enceliodes), and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) > 90% when applied preemergence (PRE) or soon after peanut emergence (EPOST). CGA-152005 postemergence (POST) controlled eclipta > 95%; sandhills amaranth (Amaranthus arenicola) 99%; golden crownbeard, pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), and hophornbeam copperleaf (Acalypha ostryifolia) < 80%; and Palmer amaranth and ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) from 37 to 89%. CGA-152005 injured peanut up to 37% and reduced yield up to 94%.

Keywords

CGA-152005 (proposed common name prosulfuron), 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[2-(3,3,3-trifluoroprophyl)phenylsufonyl]ureaeclipta, Eclipta prostrata L. # ECLALgolden crownbeard, Verbesina enceliodes (Cav.) Benth et Hook # VERENhophornbeam copperleaf, Acalypha ostryifolia Riddell # ACCOSivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHEPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. # AMAPApitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAsandhills amaranth, Amaranthus arenicola I.M. Johnst. # AMAARpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘GK-7.’Groundnutpreemergencepostemergenceweed managementEPOST, early postemergencePOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2000, pp. 218 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control POST with acetoloctate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 10: 576–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altom, J. V., Westerman, R. B., and Murray, D. S. 1995. Eclipta (Eclipta prostrata L.) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci. 22: 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1993. Ciba CGA-152005 experimental herbicide for broadleaf weed Control. Technical information. Greensboro, NC: Ciba Plant Protection, Ciba-Geigy Corporation. 10 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1994. Product manual. Wilmington, DE: E. I. duPont Nemours and Company. pp. 29–36, 113-122.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1995. CGA-152005: herbicide for broadleaf weed Control. Technical information. Greensboro, NC: Ciba Crop Protection, Ciba-Geigy Corporation. 12 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. Pursuit® herbicide label. Parsippany, NJ: American Cyanamid Co.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J., and Colvin, D. L. 1991. Weed management in peanuts. In Pimentel, D., ed. CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. 2nd ed, Volume 3. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 239–251.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E. 1997. Interacting effects of MON 12000 and CGA-152005 with other herbicides in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 45: 434–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, R. J., Allison, A. H., and Tripp, L. D. 1982. Cultural practices. In Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: American Peanut Research and Education Society. pp. 123–138.Google Scholar
Kupatt, C., Gillespie, C., Peek, J. W., Geeber, H. R., Merey, W., Oertle, K., and Schulte, M. 1993. Broadleaf weed control with CGA-152005, a new herbicide for corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:7.Google Scholar
Littlefield, T. A., Colvin, D. L., Brecke, B. J., and McCarty, L. B. 1997. Effect of nicosulfuron mixtures and time of application on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. Weed Technol. 11: 1–6.Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. R. and Kapusta, G. 1996. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in corn (Zea mays) with CGA-152005. Weed Technol. 10: 689–698.Google Scholar
Robbie, J. M., Wilcut, J. W., and York, A. C. 1995. Weed management systems in peanut with CGA-152005. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 27:64.Google Scholar
Uludag, A., Lyon, D. J., Nissen, S. J., and Kachman, S. D. 1997. Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) response to CGA-152005, metsulfuron, and triasulfuron. Weed Technol. 11: 138–143.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H., Wells, L. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Bristly starbur (Acanthosperum hispidum) interference in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37: 196–200.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of foliar-applied chlorimuron in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37: 175–180.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Walker, F. R. Jr., and Horton, D. N. 1991. Imazethapyr for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 18: 26–30.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 177–205.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., Grichar, W. J., and Wehtje, G. R. 1995. The biology and management of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). In Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. pp. 207–244.Google Scholar
Young, J. H., Person, N. K., Donald, J. O., and Mayfield, W. H., 1982. Harvesting, curing, and energy utilization. In Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: American Peanut Research and Education Society. pp. 458–487.Google Scholar